Reading & WritingChapter 6: Cross-Text Connections
Session progress0 of 20 studied
- Again
- 0
- Hard
- 0
- Good
- 0
- Easy
- 0
Card 1 of 20. Answer hidden.
Prompt
Understanding Text 2: 6-2: Official SAT mapping?
💡Use the Text 1 → Text 2 → relationship sequence.
Answer
Craft and Structure → Cross-Text Connections.
Prompt
Understanding Text 2: 6-2: Three-stage model?
Answer
Understand Text 1, understand Text 2, then evaluate the stem-directed relationship.
Prompt
Understanding Text 2: 6-2: What makes an answer cross-text?
Answer
Its accuracy depends meaningfully on information from both texts.
ExampleTest the statement against both texts and preserve each qualification.
Prompt
Understanding Text 2: 6-2: Does the same topic prove agreement?
💡Use the Text 1 → Text 2 → relationship sequence.
Answer
No. A shared topic does not establish a shared claim.
Prompt
Understanding Text 2: 6-2: Scope words to protect?
Answer
May, can, often, primarily, only, some, and under specified conditions.
Prompt
Understanding Text 2: 6-2: Text-2-only trap?
Answer
A statement accurately supported by Text 2 that lacks support from Text 1 when both are required.
Prompt
Understanding Text 2: 6-2: Overgeneralization warning?
💡Use the Text 1 → Text 2 → relationship sequence.
Answer
Reject an absolute conclusion when either text states a condition, uncertainty, or limited context.
Prompt
Understanding Text 2: 6-2: Relationship prediction?
Answer
Before reading choices, complete: Text 2 ___ Text 1 by ___.
ExampleTest the statement against both texts and preserve each qualification.
Prompt
Understanding Text 2: 6-2: Why identify the stem criterion?
Answer
One pair may support several true relationships, but only the requested comparison answers the question.
Prompt
Understanding Text 2: 6-2: Final verification?
💡Use the Text 1 → Text 2 → relationship sequence.
Answer
Point to exact support in Text 1 and Text 2, then check attribution, relationship, scope, and certainty.
Prompt
Understanding Text 2: 6-2: Direct agreement?
Answer
Both texts affirm the same relevant proposition with compatible scope.
Prompt
Understanding Text 2: 6-2: Partial agreement?
Answer
The texts share a bounded claim but differ elsewhere in emphasis, scope, cause, or interpretation.
Prompt
Understanding Text 2: 6-2: Alternative explanation?
💡Use the Text 1 → Text 2 → relationship sequence.
Answer
Text 2 may accept Text 1's observation while proposing a different cause or mechanism.
ExampleTest the statement against both texts and preserve each qualification.
Prompt
Understanding Text 2: 6-2: Different evidence?
Answer
The texts use distinct information sources; that fact alone does not determine whether their claims agree.
Prompt
Understanding Text 2: 6-2: Unsupported intent warning?
Answer
Do not infer admiration, hostility, certainty, or motive unless the text establishes it.
Prompt
Understanding Text 2: When should you assign Text 2's relationship?
💡Use the Text 1 → Text 2 → relationship sequence.
Answer
After reading its full position, including any final qualification.
Prompt
Understanding Text 2: Text 2 accepts a result but offers another cause. What changed?
Answer
The explanation changed; the observed result did not.
Prompt
Understanding Text 2: Why read Text 2 independently first?
Answer
So you identify what it actually claims before forcing it into an agreement/disagreement label.
ExampleTest the statement against both texts and preserve each qualification.
Prompt
Understanding Text 2: First-sentence trap in Text 2
💡Use the Text 1 → Text 2 → relationship sequence.
Answer
Classifying the relationship before a later sentence narrows or reverses the apparent stance.
Prompt
Understanding Text 2: A useful Text 2 scratch line
Answer
T2: claims ___ because ___, but only/although ___; relative to T1, it ___.
✓Deck completeYou rated every card. Revisit difficult cards or shuffle for another pass.
Keyboard: Space reveals, left/right arrows navigate, 1–4 rate, and S shuffles.