Reading & WritingChapter 6: Cross-Text Connections
Session progress0 of 20 studied
- Again
- 0
- Hard
- 0
- Good
- 0
- Easy
- 0
Card 1 of 20. Answer hidden.
Prompt
How One Author Would Respond: 6-5: Official SAT mapping?
💡Use the Text 1 → Text 2 → relationship sequence.
Answer
Craft and Structure → Cross-Text Connections.
Prompt
How One Author Would Respond: 6-5: Three-stage model?
Answer
Understand Text 1, understand Text 2, then evaluate the stem-directed relationship.
Prompt
How One Author Would Respond: 6-5: What makes an answer cross-text?
Answer
Its accuracy depends meaningfully on information from both texts.
ExampleTest the statement against both texts and preserve each qualification.
Prompt
How One Author Would Respond: 6-5: Does the same topic prove agreement?
💡Use the Text 1 → Text 2 → relationship sequence.
Answer
No. A shared topic does not establish a shared claim.
Prompt
How One Author Would Respond: 6-5: Scope words to protect?
Answer
May, can, often, primarily, only, some, and under specified conditions.
Prompt
How One Author Would Respond: 6-5: Text-2-only trap?
Answer
A statement accurately supported by Text 2 that lacks support from Text 1 when both are required.
Prompt
How One Author Would Respond: 6-5: Overgeneralization warning?
💡Use the Text 1 → Text 2 → relationship sequence.
Answer
Reject an absolute conclusion when either text states a condition, uncertainty, or limited context.
Prompt
How One Author Would Respond: 6-5: Relationship prediction?
Answer
Before reading choices, complete: Text 2 ___ Text 1 by ___.
ExampleTest the statement against both texts and preserve each qualification.
Prompt
How One Author Would Respond: 6-5: Why identify the stem criterion?
Answer
One pair may support several true relationships, but only the requested comparison answers the question.
Prompt
How One Author Would Respond: 6-5: Final verification?
💡Use the Text 1 → Text 2 → relationship sequence.
Answer
Point to exact support in Text 1 and Text 2, then check attribution, relationship, scope, and certainty.
Prompt
How One Author Would Respond: 6-5: Direct agreement?
Answer
Both texts affirm the same relevant proposition with compatible scope.
Prompt
How One Author Would Respond: 6-5: Partial agreement?
Answer
The texts share a bounded claim but differ elsewhere in emphasis, scope, cause, or interpretation.
Prompt
How One Author Would Respond: 6-5: Alternative explanation?
💡Use the Text 1 → Text 2 → relationship sequence.
Answer
Text 2 may accept Text 1's observation while proposing a different cause or mechanism.
ExampleTest the statement against both texts and preserve each qualification.
Prompt
How One Author Would Respond: 6-5: Different evidence?
Answer
The texts use distinct information sources; that fact alone does not determine whether their claims agree.
Prompt
How One Author Would Respond: 6-5: Unsupported intent warning?
Answer
Do not infer admiration, hostility, certainty, or motive unless the text establishes it.
Prompt
How One Author Would Respond: Author-response rule
💡Use the Text 1 → Text 2 → relationship sequence.
Answer
Use the responding text's stated stance, not an imagined personality, motive, or outside belief.
Prompt
How One Author Would Respond: Three-step response method
Answer
Identify the target claim, locate the responding text's relevant point, and preserve its certainty.
Prompt
How One Author Would Respond: Text 2 supports a claim only in cities. Response to a universal claim?
Answer
Qualify it by limiting the claim to the urban context Text 2 supports.
ExampleTest the statement against both texts and preserve each qualification.
Prompt
How One Author Would Respond: Wrong-claim-target trap
💡Use the Text 1 → Text 2 → relationship sequence.
Answer
Applying a real Text 2 idea to a different part of Text 1 than the stem names.
Prompt
How One Author Would Respond: Likely response is not inference without limits
Answer
A response must be a reasonable application of the text's position, with no invented attitude or certainty.
✓Deck completeYou rated every card. Revisit difficult cards or shuffle for another pass.
Keyboard: Space reveals, left/right arrows navigate, 1–4 rate, and S shuffles.