Leaf-surface droplets
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account that describes waxed leavesPunctuation boundary blank: _____ remains central to the archive.
Practice
Fifty original SAT-style Boundaries questions for Topic 9-10.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account that describes waxed leavesPunctuation boundary blank: _____ remains central to the archive.
Restrictive Element
Predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject from its main verb.
Correct. No punctuation separates the essential identifying clause from the rest of its noun phrase or predicate.
Incorrect. A comma would incorrectly present the identifying information as supplementary.
Incorrect. A dash would incorrectly set off information needed to identify the account.
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account that describes waxed leaves remains central to the archive.”
subject + restrictive clause + predicate
restrictive element → predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account, which describes Laleh's interviewPunctuation boundary blank: _____ presents a clear comparison.
Supplement
Predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
Incorrect. A dash would mismatch the comma that opened the supplement.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject phrase from its predicate.
Correct. The closing comma completes the paired boundary around the nonrestrictive clause.
Incorrect. Omitting the closing comma incorrectly treats the added comment as restrictive and leaves the pair incomplete.
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account, which describes Laleh's interview, presents a clear comparison.”
identified noun, nonrestrictive clause, predicate
supplement → predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account that describes the old depot shellPunctuation boundary blank: _____ remains central to the archive.
Restrictive Element
Predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
Incorrect. A comma would incorrectly present the identifying information as supplementary.
Incorrect. A dash would incorrectly set off information needed to identify the account.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject from its main verb.
Correct. No punctuation separates the essential identifying clause from the rest of its noun phrase or predicate.
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account that describes the old depot shell remains central to the archive.”
subject + restrictive clause + predicate
restrictive element → predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account, which describes MaraPunctuation boundary blank: _____ presents a clear comparison.
Supplement
Predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
Correct. The closing comma completes the paired boundary around the nonrestrictive clause.
Incorrect. Omitting the closing comma incorrectly treats the added comment as restrictive and leaves the pair incomplete.
Incorrect. A dash would mismatch the comma that opened the supplement.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject phrase from its predicate.
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account, which describes Mara, presents a clear comparison.”
identified noun, nonrestrictive clause, predicate
supplement → predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account that describes raised crossingsPunctuation boundary blank: _____ remains central to the archive.
Restrictive Element
Predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject from its main verb.
Correct. No punctuation separates the essential identifying clause from the rest of its noun phrase or predicate.
Incorrect. A comma would incorrectly present the identifying information as supplementary.
Incorrect. A dash would incorrectly set off information needed to identify the account.
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account that describes raised crossings remains central to the archive.”
subject + restrictive clause + predicate
restrictive element → predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account, which describes chronological layoutPunctuation boundary blank: _____ presents a clear comparison.
Supplement
Predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
Incorrect. A dash would mismatch the comma that opened the supplement.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject phrase from its predicate.
Correct. The closing comma completes the paired boundary around the nonrestrictive clause.
Incorrect. Omitting the closing comma incorrectly treats the added comment as restrictive and leaves the pair incomplete.
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account, which describes chronological layout, presents a clear comparison.”
identified noun, nonrestrictive clause, predicate
supplement → predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account that describes NiaPunctuation boundary blank: _____ remains central to the archive.
Restrictive Element
Predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
Incorrect. A comma would incorrectly present the identifying information as supplementary.
Incorrect. A dash would incorrectly set off information needed to identify the account.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject from its main verb.
Correct. No punctuation separates the essential identifying clause from the rest of its noun phrase or predicate.
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account that describes Nia remains central to the archive.”
subject + restrictive clause + predicate
restrictive element → predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account, which describes translated noticesPunctuation boundary blank: _____ presents a clear comparison.
Supplement
Predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
Correct. The closing comma completes the paired boundary around the nonrestrictive clause.
Incorrect. Omitting the closing comma incorrectly treats the added comment as restrictive and leaves the pair incomplete.
Incorrect. A dash would mismatch the comma that opened the supplement.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject phrase from its predicate.
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account, which describes translated notices, presents a clear comparison.”
identified noun, nonrestrictive clause, predicate
supplement → predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account that describes Voice OnePunctuation boundary blank: _____ remains central to the archive.
Restrictive Element
Predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject from its main verb.
Correct. No punctuation separates the essential identifying clause from the rest of its noun phrase or predicate.
Incorrect. A comma would incorrectly present the identifying information as supplementary.
Incorrect. A dash would incorrectly set off information needed to identify the account.
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account that describes Voice One remains central to the archive.”
subject + restrictive clause + predicate
restrictive element → predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account, which describes TomasPunctuation boundary blank: _____ presents a clear comparison.
Supplement
Predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
Incorrect. A dash would mismatch the comma that opened the supplement.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject phrase from its predicate.
Correct. The closing comma completes the paired boundary around the nonrestrictive clause.
Incorrect. Omitting the closing comma incorrectly treats the added comment as restrictive and leaves the pair incomplete.
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account, which describes Tomas, presents a clear comparison.”
identified noun, nonrestrictive clause, predicate
supplement → predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account that describes short object labelsPunctuation boundary blank: _____ remains central to the archive.
Restrictive Element
Predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
Incorrect. A comma would incorrectly present the identifying information as supplementary.
Incorrect. A dash would incorrectly set off information needed to identify the account.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject from its main verb.
Correct. No punctuation separates the essential identifying clause from the rest of its noun phrase or predicate.
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account that describes short object labels remains central to the archive.”
subject + restrictive clause + predicate
restrictive element → predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account, which describes planning sketchesPunctuation boundary blank: _____ presents a clear comparison.
Supplement
Predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
Correct. The closing comma completes the paired boundary around the nonrestrictive clause.
Incorrect. Omitting the closing comma incorrectly treats the added comment as restrictive and leaves the pair incomplete.
Incorrect. A dash would mismatch the comma that opened the supplement.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject phrase from its predicate.
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account, which describes planning sketches, presents a clear comparison.”
identified noun, nonrestrictive clause, predicate
supplement → predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account that describes Evelyn's mapPunctuation boundary blank: _____ remains central to the archive.
Restrictive Element
Predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject from its main verb.
Correct. No punctuation separates the essential identifying clause from the rest of its noun phrase or predicate.
Incorrect. A comma would incorrectly present the identifying information as supplementary.
Incorrect. A dash would incorrectly set off information needed to identify the account.
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account that describes Evelyn's map remains central to the archive.”
subject + restrictive clause + predicate
restrictive element → predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account, which describes fixed shiftsPunctuation boundary blank: _____ presents a clear comparison.
Supplement
Predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
Incorrect. A dash would mismatch the comma that opened the supplement.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject phrase from its predicate.
Correct. The closing comma completes the paired boundary around the nonrestrictive clause.
Incorrect. Omitting the closing comma incorrectly treats the added comment as restrictive and leaves the pair incomplete.
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account, which describes fixed shifts, presents a clear comparison.”
identified noun, nonrestrictive clause, predicate
supplement → predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account that describes plain-language synopsisPunctuation boundary blank: _____ remains central to the archive.
Restrictive Element
Predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
Incorrect. A comma would incorrectly present the identifying information as supplementary.
Incorrect. A dash would incorrectly set off information needed to identify the account.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject from its main verb.
Correct. No punctuation separates the essential identifying clause from the rest of its noun phrase or predicate.
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account that describes plain-language synopsis remains central to the archive.”
subject + restrictive clause + predicate
restrictive element → predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account, which describes LeenaPunctuation boundary blank: _____ presents a clear comparison.
Supplement
Predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
Correct. The closing comma completes the paired boundary around the nonrestrictive clause.
Incorrect. Omitting the closing comma incorrectly treats the added comment as restrictive and leaves the pair incomplete.
Incorrect. A dash would mismatch the comma that opened the supplement.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject phrase from its predicate.
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account, which describes Leena, presents a clear comparison.”
identified noun, nonrestrictive clause, predicate
supplement → predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account that describes Ridge ParkPunctuation boundary blank: _____ remains central to the archive.
Restrictive Element
Predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject from its main verb.
Correct. No punctuation separates the essential identifying clause from the rest of its noun phrase or predicate.
Incorrect. A comma would incorrectly present the identifying information as supplementary.
Incorrect. A dash would incorrectly set off information needed to identify the account.
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account that describes Ridge Park remains central to the archive.”
subject + restrictive clause + predicate
restrictive element → predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account, which describes ridge mossPunctuation boundary blank: _____ presents a clear comparison.
Supplement
Predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
Incorrect. A dash would mismatch the comma that opened the supplement.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject phrase from its predicate.
Correct. The closing comma completes the paired boundary around the nonrestrictive clause.
Incorrect. Omitting the closing comma incorrectly treats the added comment as restrictive and leaves the pair incomplete.
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account, which describes ridge moss, presents a clear comparison.”
identified noun, nonrestrictive clause, predicate
supplement → predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account that describes AmalPunctuation boundary blank: _____ remains central to the archive.
Restrictive Element
Predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
Incorrect. A comma would incorrectly present the identifying information as supplementary.
Incorrect. A dash would incorrectly set off information needed to identify the account.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject from its main verb.
Correct. No punctuation separates the essential identifying clause from the rest of its noun phrase or predicate.
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account that describes Amal remains central to the archive.”
subject + restrictive clause + predicate
restrictive element → predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account, which describes cost-framed signsPunctuation boundary blank: _____ presents a clear comparison.
Supplement
Predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
Correct. The closing comma completes the paired boundary around the nonrestrictive clause.
Incorrect. Omitting the closing comma incorrectly treats the added comment as restrictive and leaves the pair incomplete.
Incorrect. A dash would mismatch the comma that opened the supplement.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject phrase from its predicate.
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account, which describes cost-framed signs, presents a clear comparison.”
identified noun, nonrestrictive clause, predicate
supplement → predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account that describes dark-coated seedsPunctuation boundary blank: _____ remains central to the archive.
Restrictive Element
Predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject from its main verb.
Correct. No punctuation separates the essential identifying clause from the rest of its noun phrase or predicate.
Incorrect. A comma would incorrectly present the identifying information as supplementary.
Incorrect. A dash would incorrectly set off information needed to identify the account.
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account that describes dark-coated seeds remains central to the archive.”
subject + restrictive clause + predicate
restrictive element → predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account, which describes DavinPunctuation boundary blank: _____ presents a clear comparison.
Supplement
Predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
Incorrect. A dash would mismatch the comma that opened the supplement.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject phrase from its predicate.
Correct. The closing comma completes the paired boundary around the nonrestrictive clause.
Incorrect. Omitting the closing comma incorrectly treats the added comment as restrictive and leaves the pair incomplete.
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account, which describes Davin, presents a clear comparison.”
identified noun, nonrestrictive clause, predicate
supplement → predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account that describes online map commentsPunctuation boundary blank: _____ remains central to the archive.
Restrictive Element
Predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
Incorrect. A comma would incorrectly present the identifying information as supplementary.
Incorrect. A dash would incorrectly set off information needed to identify the account.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject from its main verb.
Correct. No punctuation separates the essential identifying clause from the rest of its noun phrase or predicate.
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account that describes online map comments remains central to the archive.”
subject + restrictive clause + predicate
restrictive element → predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account, which describes continuous hedgePunctuation boundary blank: _____ presents a clear comparison.
Supplement
Predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
Correct. The closing comma completes the paired boundary around the nonrestrictive clause.
Incorrect. Omitting the closing comma incorrectly treats the added comment as restrictive and leaves the pair incomplete.
Incorrect. A dash would mismatch the comma that opened the supplement.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject phrase from its predicate.
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account, which describes continuous hedge, presents a clear comparison.”
identified noun, nonrestrictive clause, predicate
supplement → predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account that describes SuriPunctuation boundary blank: _____ remains central to the archive.
Restrictive Element
Predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject from its main verb.
Correct. No punctuation separates the essential identifying clause from the rest of its noun phrase or predicate.
Incorrect. A comma would incorrectly present the identifying information as supplementary.
Incorrect. A dash would incorrectly set off information needed to identify the account.
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account that describes Suri remains central to the archive.”
subject + restrictive clause + predicate
restrictive element → predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account, which describes before-school servicePunctuation boundary blank: _____ presents a clear comparison.
Supplement
Predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
Incorrect. A dash would mismatch the comma that opened the supplement.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject phrase from its predicate.
Correct. The closing comma completes the paired boundary around the nonrestrictive clause.
Incorrect. Omitting the closing comma incorrectly treats the added comment as restrictive and leaves the pair incomplete.
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account, which describes before-school service, presents a clear comparison.”
identified noun, nonrestrictive clause, predicate
supplement → predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account that describes ribbed tilesPunctuation boundary blank: _____ remains central to the archive.
Restrictive Element
Predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
Incorrect. A comma would incorrectly present the identifying information as supplementary.
Incorrect. A dash would incorrectly set off information needed to identify the account.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject from its main verb.
Correct. No punctuation separates the essential identifying clause from the rest of its noun phrase or predicate.
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account that describes ribbed tiles remains central to the archive.”
subject + restrictive clause + predicate
restrictive element → predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account, which describes the postcardPunctuation boundary blank: _____ presents a clear comparison.
Supplement
Predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
Correct. The closing comma completes the paired boundary around the nonrestrictive clause.
Incorrect. Omitting the closing comma incorrectly treats the added comment as restrictive and leaves the pair incomplete.
Incorrect. A dash would mismatch the comma that opened the supplement.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject phrase from its predicate.
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account, which describes the postcard, presents a clear comparison.”
identified noun, nonrestrictive clause, predicate
supplement → predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account that describes the fountain planPunctuation boundary blank: _____ remains central to the archive.
Restrictive Element
Predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject from its main verb.
Correct. No punctuation separates the essential identifying clause from the rest of its noun phrase or predicate.
Incorrect. A comma would incorrectly present the identifying information as supplementary.
Incorrect. A dash would incorrectly set off information needed to identify the account.
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account that describes the fountain plan remains central to the archive.”
subject + restrictive clause + predicate
restrictive element → predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account, which describes color cuePunctuation boundary blank: _____ presents a clear comparison.
Supplement
Predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
Incorrect. A dash would mismatch the comma that opened the supplement.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject phrase from its predicate.
Correct. The closing comma completes the paired boundary around the nonrestrictive clause.
Incorrect. Omitting the closing comma incorrectly treats the added comment as restrictive and leaves the pair incomplete.
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account, which describes color cue, presents a clear comparison.”
identified noun, nonrestrictive clause, predicate
supplement → predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account that describes MeiPunctuation boundary blank: _____ remains central to the archive.
Restrictive Element
Predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
Incorrect. A comma would incorrectly present the identifying information as supplementary.
Incorrect. A dash would incorrectly set off information needed to identify the account.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject from its main verb.
Correct. No punctuation separates the essential identifying clause from the rest of its noun phrase or predicate.
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account that describes Mei remains central to the archive.”
subject + restrictive clause + predicate
restrictive element → predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account, which describes blue floor markingsPunctuation boundary blank: _____ presents a clear comparison.
Supplement
Predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
Correct. The closing comma completes the paired boundary around the nonrestrictive clause.
Incorrect. Omitting the closing comma incorrectly treats the added comment as restrictive and leaves the pair incomplete.
Incorrect. A dash would mismatch the comma that opened the supplement.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject phrase from its predicate.
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account, which describes blue floor markings, presents a clear comparison.”
identified noun, nonrestrictive clause, predicate
supplement → predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account that describes woody barriersPunctuation boundary blank: _____ remains central to the archive.
Restrictive Element
Predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject from its main verb.
Correct. No punctuation separates the essential identifying clause from the rest of its noun phrase or predicate.
Incorrect. A comma would incorrectly present the identifying information as supplementary.
Incorrect. A dash would incorrectly set off information needed to identify the account.
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account that describes woody barriers remains central to the archive.”
subject + restrictive clause + predicate
restrictive element → predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account, which describes JunPunctuation boundary blank: _____ presents a clear comparison.
Supplement
Predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
Incorrect. A dash would mismatch the comma that opened the supplement.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject phrase from its predicate.
Correct. The closing comma completes the paired boundary around the nonrestrictive clause.
Incorrect. Omitting the closing comma incorrectly treats the added comment as restrictive and leaves the pair incomplete.
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account, which describes Jun, presents a clear comparison.”
identified noun, nonrestrictive clause, predicate
supplement → predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account that describes river-clay bowlsPunctuation boundary blank: _____ remains central to the archive.
Restrictive Element
Predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
Incorrect. A comma would incorrectly present the identifying information as supplementary.
Incorrect. A dash would incorrectly set off information needed to identify the account.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject from its main verb.
Correct. No punctuation separates the essential identifying clause from the rest of its noun phrase or predicate.
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account that describes river-clay bowls remains central to the archive.”
subject + restrictive clause + predicate
restrictive element → predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account, which describes wide flowersPunctuation boundary blank: _____ presents a clear comparison.
Supplement
Predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
Correct. The closing comma completes the paired boundary around the nonrestrictive clause.
Incorrect. Omitting the closing comma incorrectly treats the added comment as restrictive and leaves the pair incomplete.
Incorrect. A dash would mismatch the comma that opened the supplement.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject phrase from its predicate.
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account, which describes wide flowers, presents a clear comparison.”
identified noun, nonrestrictive clause, predicate
supplement → predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account that describes AshaPunctuation boundary blank: _____ remains central to the archive.
Restrictive Element
Predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject from its main verb.
Correct. No punctuation separates the essential identifying clause from the rest of its noun phrase or predicate.
Incorrect. A comma would incorrectly present the identifying information as supplementary.
Incorrect. A dash would incorrectly set off information needed to identify the account.
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account that describes Asha remains central to the archive.”
subject + restrictive clause + predicate
restrictive element → predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account, which describes descriptive captionsPunctuation boundary blank: _____ presents a clear comparison.
Supplement
Predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
Incorrect. A dash would mismatch the comma that opened the supplement.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject phrase from its predicate.
Correct. The closing comma completes the paired boundary around the nonrestrictive clause.
Incorrect. Omitting the closing comma incorrectly treats the added comment as restrictive and leaves the pair incomplete.
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account, which describes descriptive captions, presents a clear comparison.”
identified noun, nonrestrictive clause, predicate
supplement → predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account that describes cool storagePunctuation boundary blank: _____ remains central to the archive.
Restrictive Element
Predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
Incorrect. A comma would incorrectly present the identifying information as supplementary.
Incorrect. A dash would incorrectly set off information needed to identify the account.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject from its main verb.
Correct. No punctuation separates the essential identifying clause from the rest of its noun phrase or predicate.
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account that describes cool storage remains central to the archive.”
subject + restrictive clause + predicate
restrictive element → predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account, which describes the carved chairPunctuation boundary blank: _____ presents a clear comparison.
Supplement
Predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
Correct. The closing comma completes the paired boundary around the nonrestrictive clause.
Incorrect. Omitting the closing comma incorrectly treats the added comment as restrictive and leaves the pair incomplete.
Incorrect. A dash would mismatch the comma that opened the supplement.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject phrase from its predicate.
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account, which describes the carved chair, presents a clear comparison.”
identified noun, nonrestrictive clause, predicate
supplement → predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account that describes field recordingsPunctuation boundary blank: _____ remains central to the archive.
Restrictive Element
Predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject from its main verb.
Correct. No punctuation separates the essential identifying clause from the rest of its noun phrase or predicate.
Incorrect. A comma would incorrectly present the identifying information as supplementary.
Incorrect. A dash would incorrectly set off information needed to identify the account.
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account that describes field recordings remains central to the archive.”
subject + restrictive clause + predicate
restrictive element → predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account, which describes automated microphonesPunctuation boundary blank: _____ presents a clear comparison.
Supplement
Predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
Incorrect. A dash would mismatch the comma that opened the supplement.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject phrase from its predicate.
Correct. The closing comma completes the paired boundary around the nonrestrictive clause.
Incorrect. Omitting the closing comma incorrectly treats the added comment as restrictive and leaves the pair incomplete.
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account, which describes automated microphones, presents a clear comparison.”
identified noun, nonrestrictive clause, predicate
supplement → predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account that describes harbor tax listsPunctuation boundary blank: _____ remains central to the archive.
Restrictive Element
Predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
Incorrect. A comma would incorrectly present the identifying information as supplementary.
Incorrect. A dash would incorrectly set off information needed to identify the account.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject from its main verb.
Correct. No punctuation separates the essential identifying clause from the rest of its noun phrase or predicate.
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account that describes harbor tax lists remains central to the archive.”
subject + restrictive clause + predicate
restrictive element → predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account, which describes version APunctuation boundary blank: _____ presents a clear comparison.
Supplement
Predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
Correct. The closing comma completes the paired boundary around the nonrestrictive clause.
Incorrect. Omitting the closing comma incorrectly treats the added comment as restrictive and leaves the pair incomplete.
Incorrect. A dash would mismatch the comma that opened the supplement.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject phrase from its predicate.
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account, which describes version A, presents a clear comparison.”
identified noun, nonrestrictive clause, predicate
supplement → predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account that describes line KPunctuation boundary blank: _____ remains central to the archive.
Restrictive Element
Predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject from its main verb.
Correct. No punctuation separates the essential identifying clause from the rest of its noun phrase or predicate.
Incorrect. A comma would incorrectly present the identifying information as supplementary.
Incorrect. A dash would incorrectly set off information needed to identify the account.
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account that describes line K remains central to the archive.”
subject + restrictive clause + predicate
restrictive element → predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account, which describes Block AlderPunctuation boundary blank: _____ presents a clear comparison.
Supplement
Predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
Incorrect. A dash would mismatch the comma that opened the supplement.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject phrase from its predicate.
Correct. The closing comma completes the paired boundary around the nonrestrictive clause.
Incorrect. Omitting the closing comma incorrectly treats the added comment as restrictive and leaves the pair incomplete.
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account, which describes Block Alder, presents a clear comparison.”
identified noun, nonrestrictive clause, predicate
supplement → predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account that describes large date textPunctuation boundary blank: _____ remains central to the archive.
Restrictive Element
Predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
Incorrect. A comma would incorrectly present the identifying information as supplementary.
Incorrect. A dash would incorrectly set off information needed to identify the account.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject from its main verb.
Correct. No punctuation separates the essential identifying clause from the rest of its noun phrase or predicate.
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account that describes large date text remains central to the archive.”
subject + restrictive clause + predicate
restrictive element → predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account, which describes healthy-reef soundsPunctuation boundary blank: _____ presents a clear comparison.
Supplement
Predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
Correct. The closing comma completes the paired boundary around the nonrestrictive clause.
Incorrect. Omitting the closing comma incorrectly treats the added comment as restrictive and leaves the pair incomplete.
Incorrect. A dash would mismatch the comma that opened the supplement.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject phrase from its predicate.
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account, which describes healthy-reef sounds, presents a clear comparison.”
identified noun, nonrestrictive clause, predicate
supplement → predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account that describes mobile library stopsPunctuation boundary blank: _____ remains central to the archive.
Restrictive Element
Predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject from its main verb.
Correct. No punctuation separates the essential identifying clause from the rest of its noun phrase or predicate.
Incorrect. A comma would incorrectly present the identifying information as supplementary.
Incorrect. A dash would incorrectly set off information needed to identify the account.
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account that describes mobile library stops remains central to the archive.”
subject + restrictive clause + predicate
restrictive element → predicate
The restrictive clause identifies which account is meant and remains attached to the subject without punctuation.
The passage identifies its subject before adding detail. The account, which describes symbolic notationPunctuation boundary blank: _____ presents a clear comparison.
Supplement
Predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
Incorrect. A dash would mismatch the comma that opened the supplement.
Incorrect. A semicolon would split the subject phrase from its predicate.
Correct. The closing comma completes the paired boundary around the nonrestrictive clause.
Incorrect. Omitting the closing comma incorrectly treats the added comment as restrictive and leaves the pair incomplete.
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas. The conventionally completed text reads: “The account, which describes symbolic notation, presents a clear comparison.”
identified noun, nonrestrictive clause, predicate
supplement → predicate
The already identified noun is followed by a nonrestrictive relative clause enclosed by commas.
Keyboard: use Tab to move, arrow keys to change answer choices, and Enter to check an answer.
Use the results to decide what to review before your next attempt.
No mistakes this time. Excellent work.