Practice
Fifty original digital-SAT-style Command of Evidence questions for Topic 3-6: Interpreting Line Graphs.
In a hypothetical literature investigation of Kavi in an original story, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records willingness to revise a plan for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that asking Leena to redraw the route shows a sustained increase in willingness to revise a plan from baseline through follow-up.
The team claims that asking Leena to redraw the route shows a sustained increase in willingness to revise a plan from baseline through follow-up.
Across the ordered measurements: asking Leena to redraw the route rises at every measurement, from 23 actions at baseline to 39 actions at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
Across the ordered measurements: asking Leena to redraw the route rises at every measurement, from 23 actions at baseline to 39 actions at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that asking Leena to redraw the route shows a sustained increase in willingness to revise a plan from baseline through follow-up.
asking Leena to redraw the route: 23, 27, 33, 39 actions; insisting on his damaged map: 47, 43, 39, 35 actions
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical science investigation of model turbine blades, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records noise reduction for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that the gap in noise reduction between textured trailing edges and plain trailing edges narrows across the four measurements.
The team claims that the gap in noise reduction between textured trailing edges and plain trailing edges narrows across the four measurements.
Across the ordered measurements: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 dB at baseline to 7 dB at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
Across the ordered measurements: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 dB at baseline to 7 dB at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that the gap in noise reduction between textured trailing edges and plain trailing edges narrows across the four measurements.
textured trailing edges: 30, 35, 42, 49 dB; plain trailing edges: 54, 50, 46, 42 dB
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical history social studies investigation of neighborhood residents, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records postal codes represented for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that comment boxes in libraries exceeds a city-hall-only box in postal codes represented by follow-up.
The team claims that comment boxes in libraries exceeds a city-hall-only box in postal codes represented by follow-up.
Across the ordered measurements: At follow-up, comment boxes in libraries reaches 59 codes, exceeding a city-hall-only box at 49 codes.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
Across the ordered measurements: At follow-up, comment boxes in libraries reaches 59 codes, exceeding a city-hall-only box at 49 codes. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that comment boxes in libraries exceeds a city-hall-only box in postal codes represented by follow-up.
comment boxes in libraries: 37, 43, 51, 59 codes; a city-hall-only box: 61, 57, 53, 49 codes
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical humanities investigation of ceramic fragments, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records cross-vessel matches for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that organization by tool marks changes more across the measurement period than organization by color.
The team claims that organization by tool marks changes more across the measurement period than organization by color.
Across the ordered measurements: organization by tool marks changes by 25 matches, while organization by color changes by 12 matches in the opposite direction.
The selected values directly illustrate the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly illustrates the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Across the ordered measurements: organization by tool marks changes by 25 matches, while organization by color changes by 12 matches in the opposite direction. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that organization by tool marks changes more across the measurement period than organization by color.
organization by tool marks: 24, 31, 40, 49 matches; organization by color: 48, 44, 40, 36 matches
The prompt asks for evidence that illustrates the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical literature investigation of Inez in an original story, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records adaptation without erasure for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that adding a substitute in pencil shows a sustained increase in adaptation without erasure from baseline through follow-up.
The team claims that adding a substitute in pencil shows a sustained increase in adaptation without erasure from baseline through follow-up.
Across the ordered measurements: adding a substitute in pencil rises at every measurement, from 31 details at baseline to 59 details at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
Across the ordered measurements: adding a substitute in pencil rises at every measurement, from 31 details at baseline to 59 details at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that adding a substitute in pencil shows a sustained increase in adaptation without erasure from baseline through follow-up.
adding a substitute in pencil: 31, 39, 49, 59 details; erasing the original line: 55, 51, 47, 43 details
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical science investigation of greenhouse roots, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records root depth for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that the gap in root depth between less frequent deep watering and daily shallow watering narrows across the four measurements.
The team claims that the gap in root depth between less frequent deep watering and daily shallow watering narrows across the four measurements.
Across the ordered measurements: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 cm at baseline to 4 cm at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Across the ordered measurements: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 cm at baseline to 4 cm at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that the gap in root depth between less frequent deep watering and daily shallow watering narrows across the four measurements.
less frequent deep watering: 18, 22, 28, 34 cm; daily shallow watering: 42, 38, 34, 30 cm
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical history social studies investigation of service employees, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records participation for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that after-work voting exceeds noon-only voting in participation by follow-up.
The team claims that after-work voting exceeds noon-only voting in participation by follow-up.
Across the ordered measurements: At follow-up, after-work voting reaches 44 voters, exceeding noon-only voting at 37 voters.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
Across the ordered measurements: At follow-up, after-work voting reaches 44 voters, exceeding noon-only voting at 37 voters. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that after-work voting exceeds noon-only voting in participation by follow-up.
after-work voting: 25, 30, 37, 44 voters; noon-only voting: 49, 45, 41, 37 voters
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical humanities investigation of theater historians, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records casting links identified for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that digitized page margins changes more across the measurement period than cropped central text.
The team claims that digitized page margins changes more across the measurement period than cropped central text.
Across the ordered measurements: digitized page margins changes by 22 links, while cropped central text changes by 12 links in the opposite direction.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
Across the ordered measurements: digitized page margins changes by 22 links, while cropped central text changes by 12 links in the opposite direction. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that digitized page margins changes more across the measurement period than cropped central text.
digitized page margins: 32, 38, 46, 54 links; cropped central text: 56, 52, 48, 44 links
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical literature investigation of Yara in an original story, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records willingness to teach revision for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that showing a crossed-out draft shows a sustained increase in willingness to teach revision from baseline through follow-up.
The team claims that showing a crossed-out draft shows a sustained increase in willingness to teach revision from baseline through follow-up.
Across the ordered measurements: showing a crossed-out draft rises at every measurement, from 19 actions at baseline to 44 actions at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
Across the ordered measurements: showing a crossed-out draft rises at every measurement, from 19 actions at baseline to 44 actions at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that showing a crossed-out draft shows a sustained increase in willingness to teach revision from baseline through follow-up.
showing a crossed-out draft: 19, 26, 35, 44 actions; showing only the final poem: 43, 39, 35, 31 actions
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical science investigation of deep-reef light sensors, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records recorded light spikes for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that the gap in recorded light spikes between uncovered vehicle lamps and covered lamps narrows across the four measurements.
The team claims that the gap in recorded light spikes between uncovered vehicle lamps and covered lamps narrows across the four measurements.
Across the ordered measurements: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 spikes at baseline to 16 spikes at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
Across the ordered measurements: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 spikes at baseline to 16 spikes at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that the gap in recorded light spikes between uncovered vehicle lamps and covered lamps narrows across the four measurements.
uncovered vehicle lamps: 26, 34, 44, 54 spikes; covered lamps: 50, 46, 42, 38 spikes
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical history social studies investigation of shift workers, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records weekday visits for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that late museum hours exceeds daytime-only hours in weekday visits by follow-up.
The team claims that late museum hours exceeds daytime-only hours in weekday visits by follow-up.
Across the ordered measurements: At follow-up, late museum hours reaches 49 visits, exceeding daytime-only hours at 45 visits.
The selected values directly illustrate the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly illustrates the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Across the ordered measurements: At follow-up, late museum hours reaches 49 visits, exceeding daytime-only hours at 45 visits. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that late museum hours exceeds daytime-only hours in weekday visits by follow-up.
late museum hours: 33, 37, 43, 49 visits; daytime-only hours: 57, 53, 49, 45 visits
The prompt asks for evidence that illustrates the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical humanities investigation of design researchers, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records cross-period connections for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that a color-based index changes more across the measurement period than a date-based index.
The team claims that a color-based index changes more across the measurement period than a date-based index.
Across the ordered measurements: a color-based index changes by 19 connections, while a date-based index changes by 12 connections in the opposite direction.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
Across the ordered measurements: a color-based index changes by 19 connections, while a date-based index changes by 12 connections in the opposite direction. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that a color-based index changes more across the measurement period than a date-based index.
a color-based index: 20, 25, 32, 39 connections; a date-based index: 44, 40, 36, 32 connections
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical literature investigation of Sami in an original story, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records revaluation of imperfection for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that rehanging the rough-toned bell shows a sustained increase in revaluation of imperfection from baseline through follow-up.
The team claims that rehanging the rough-toned bell shows a sustained increase in revaluation of imperfection from baseline through follow-up.
Across the ordered measurements: rehanging the rough-toned bell rises at every measurement, from 27 choices at baseline to 49 choices at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Across the ordered measurements: rehanging the rough-toned bell rises at every measurement, from 27 choices at baseline to 49 choices at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that rehanging the rough-toned bell shows a sustained increase in revaluation of imperfection from baseline through follow-up.
rehanging the rough-toned bell: 27, 33, 41, 49 choices; keeping it silent: 51, 47, 43, 39 choices
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical science investigation of rooftop plants, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records living leaves after drought for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that the gap in living leaves after drought between deeper soil and shallow soil narrows across the four measurements.
The team claims that the gap in living leaves after drought between deeper soil and shallow soil narrows across the four measurements.
Across the ordered measurements: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 % at baseline to 13 % at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
Across the ordered measurements: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 % at baseline to 13 % at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that the gap in living leaves after drought between deeper soil and shallow soil narrows across the four measurements.
deeper soil: 34, 41, 50, 59 %; shallow soil: 58, 54, 50, 46 %
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical history social studies investigation of full-time workers, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records registrations for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that Saturday workshops exceeds weekday-morning workshops in registrations by follow-up.
The team claims that Saturday workshops exceeds weekday-morning workshops in registrations by follow-up.
Across the ordered measurements: At follow-up, Saturday workshops reaches 49 people, exceeding weekday-morning workshops at 33 people.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
Across the ordered measurements: At follow-up, Saturday workshops reaches 49 people, exceeding weekday-morning workshops at 33 people. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that Saturday workshops exceeds weekday-morning workshops in registrations by follow-up.
Saturday workshops: 21, 29, 39, 49 people; weekday-morning workshops: 45, 41, 37, 33 people
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical science investigation of delivery robots on wet ramps, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records successful climbs for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that textured wheel bands changes more across the measurement period than smooth wheel bands.
The team claims that textured wheel bands changes more across the measurement period than smooth wheel bands.
Across the ordered measurements: textured wheel bands changes by 16 %, while smooth wheel bands changes by 12 % in the opposite direction.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
Across the ordered measurements: textured wheel bands changes by 16 %, while smooth wheel bands changes by 12 % in the opposite direction. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that textured wheel bands changes more across the measurement period than smooth wheel bands.
textured wheel bands: 28, 32, 38, 44 %; smooth wheel bands: 52, 48, 44, 40 %
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical history social studies investigation of library visitors, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records completed visits for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that evening opening hours shows a sustained increase in completed visits from baseline through follow-up.
The team claims that evening opening hours shows a sustained increase in completed visits from baseline through follow-up.
Across the ordered measurements: evening opening hours rises at every measurement, from 35 visits at baseline to 54 visits at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
Across the ordered measurements: evening opening hours rises at every measurement, from 35 visits at baseline to 54 visits at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that evening opening hours shows a sustained increase in completed visits from baseline through follow-up.
evening opening hours: 35, 40, 47, 54 visits; daytime-only hours: 59, 55, 51, 47 visits
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical humanities investigation of museum visitors, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records identified revisions for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that the gap in identified revisions between layer-by-layer labels and single summary labels narrows across the four measurements.
The team claims that the gap in identified revisions between layer-by-layer labels and single summary labels narrows across the four measurements.
Across the ordered measurements: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 % at baseline to 10 % at follow-up.
The selected values directly illustrate the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly illustrates the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Across the ordered measurements: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 % at baseline to 10 % at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that the gap in identified revisions between layer-by-layer labels and single summary labels narrows across the four measurements.
layer-by-layer labels: 22, 28, 36, 44 %; single summary labels: 46, 42, 38, 34 %
The prompt asks for evidence that illustrates the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical literature investigation of Mira in an original story, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records candor about uncertainty for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that speaking before the council exceeds speaking privately to Ivo in candor about uncertainty by follow-up.
The team claims that speaking before the council exceeds speaking privately to Ivo in candor about uncertainty by follow-up.
Across the ordered measurements: At follow-up, speaking before the council reaches 54 instances, exceeding speaking privately to Ivo at 41 instances.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
Across the ordered measurements: At follow-up, speaking before the council reaches 54 instances, exceeding speaking privately to Ivo at 41 instances. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that speaking before the council exceeds speaking privately to Ivo in candor about uncertainty by follow-up.
speaking before the council: 29, 36, 45, 54 instances; speaking privately to Ivo: 53, 49, 45, 41 instances
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical science investigation of coastal seedlings, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records surviving leaves for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that low-salt irrigation changes more across the measurement period than high-salt irrigation.
The team claims that low-salt irrigation changes more across the measurement period than high-salt irrigation.
Across the ordered measurements: low-salt irrigation changes by 28 leaves, while high-salt irrigation changes by 12 leaves in the opposite direction.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
Across the ordered measurements: low-salt irrigation changes by 28 leaves, while high-salt irrigation changes by 12 leaves in the opposite direction. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that low-salt irrigation changes more across the measurement period than high-salt irrigation.
low-salt irrigation: 36, 44, 54, 64 leaves; high-salt irrigation: 60, 56, 52, 48 leaves
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical history social studies investigation of first-time voters, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records correctly completed sample ballots for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that a translated guide shows a sustained increase in correctly completed sample ballots from baseline through follow-up.
The team claims that a translated guide shows a sustained increase in correctly completed sample ballots from baseline through follow-up.
Across the ordered measurements: a translated guide rises at every measurement, from 23 % at baseline to 39 % at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
Across the ordered measurements: a translated guide rises at every measurement, from 23 % at baseline to 39 % at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that a translated guide shows a sustained increase in correctly completed sample ballots from baseline through follow-up.
a translated guide: 23, 27, 33, 39 %; a single-language guide: 47, 43, 39, 35 %
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical humanities investigation of student percussionists, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records synchronized entries for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that the gap in synchronized entries between rhythm-first rehearsal and melody-first rehearsal narrows across the four measurements.
The team claims that the gap in synchronized entries between rhythm-first rehearsal and melody-first rehearsal narrows across the four measurements.
Across the ordered measurements: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 % at baseline to 7 % at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
Across the ordered measurements: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 % at baseline to 7 % at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that the gap in synchronized entries between rhythm-first rehearsal and melody-first rehearsal narrows across the four measurements.
rhythm-first rehearsal: 30, 35, 42, 49 %; melody-first rehearsal: 54, 50, 46, 42 %
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical literature investigation of Jonas in an original story, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records acceptance of imperfection for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that displaying the patched kite exceeds hiding it in the shed in acceptance of imperfection by follow-up.
The team claims that displaying the patched kite exceeds hiding it in the shed in acceptance of imperfection by follow-up.
Across the ordered measurements: At follow-up, displaying the patched kite reaches 59 details, exceeding hiding it in the shed at 49 details.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Across the ordered measurements: At follow-up, displaying the patched kite reaches 59 details, exceeding hiding it in the shed at 49 details. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that displaying the patched kite exceeds hiding it in the shed in acceptance of imperfection by follow-up.
displaying the patched kite: 37, 43, 51, 59 details; hiding it in the shed: 61, 57, 53, 49 details
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical science investigation of identical roof tiles, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records retained heat for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that reflective coating changes more across the measurement period than plain coating.
The team claims that reflective coating changes more across the measurement period than plain coating.
Across the ordered measurements: reflective coating changes by 25 °C, while plain coating changes by 12 °C in the opposite direction.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
Across the ordered measurements: reflective coating changes by 25 °C, while plain coating changes by 12 °C in the opposite direction. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that reflective coating changes more across the measurement period than plain coating.
reflective coating: 24, 31, 40, 49 °C; plain coating: 48, 44, 40, 36 °C
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical history social studies investigation of rural archive donors, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records documents contributed for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that mobile scanning visits shows a sustained increase in documents contributed from baseline through follow-up.
The team claims that mobile scanning visits shows a sustained increase in documents contributed from baseline through follow-up.
Across the ordered measurements: mobile scanning visits rises at every measurement, from 31 items at baseline to 59 items at follow-up.
The selected values directly illustrate the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly illustrates the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
Across the ordered measurements: mobile scanning visits rises at every measurement, from 31 items at baseline to 59 items at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that mobile scanning visits shows a sustained increase in documents contributed from baseline through follow-up.
mobile scanning visits: 31, 39, 49, 59 items; city-only scanning: 55, 51, 47, 43 items
The prompt asks for evidence that illustrates the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical humanities investigation of gallery visitors, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records material-specific observations for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that the gap in material-specific observations between touchable material samples and text-only labels narrows across the four measurements.
The team claims that the gap in material-specific observations between touchable material samples and text-only labels narrows across the four measurements.
Across the ordered measurements: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 comments at baseline to 4 comments at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
Across the ordered measurements: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 comments at baseline to 4 comments at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that the gap in material-specific observations between touchable material samples and text-only labels narrows across the four measurements.
touchable material samples: 18, 22, 28, 34 comments; text-only labels: 42, 38, 34, 30 comments
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical literature investigation of Sana in an original story, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records readiness to collaborate for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that moving a new colleague's chair closer exceeds leaving the chair apart in readiness to collaborate by follow-up.
The team claims that moving a new colleague's chair closer exceeds leaving the chair apart in readiness to collaborate by follow-up.
Across the ordered measurements: At follow-up, moving a new colleague's chair closer reaches 44 actions, exceeding leaving the chair apart at 37 actions.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
Across the ordered measurements: At follow-up, moving a new colleague's chair closer reaches 44 actions, exceeding leaving the chair apart at 37 actions. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that moving a new colleague's chair closer exceeds leaving the chair apart in readiness to collaborate by follow-up.
moving a new colleague's chair closer: 25, 30, 37, 44 actions; leaving the chair apart: 49, 45, 41, 37 actions
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical science investigation of solitary bees, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records occupied nesting tubes for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that east-facing nest openings changes more across the measurement period than west-facing openings.
The team claims that east-facing nest openings changes more across the measurement period than west-facing openings.
Across the ordered measurements: east-facing nest openings changes by 22 %, while west-facing openings changes by 12 % in the opposite direction.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Across the ordered measurements: east-facing nest openings changes by 22 %, while west-facing openings changes by 12 % in the opposite direction. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that east-facing nest openings changes more across the measurement period than west-facing openings.
east-facing nest openings: 32, 38, 46, 54 %; west-facing openings: 56, 52, 48, 44 %
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical history social studies investigation of hourly workers, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records completed applications for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that Saturday permit appointments shows a sustained increase in completed applications from baseline through follow-up.
The team claims that Saturday permit appointments shows a sustained increase in completed applications from baseline through follow-up.
Across the ordered measurements: Saturday permit appointments rises at every measurement, from 19 applications at baseline to 44 applications at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Across the ordered measurements: Saturday permit appointments rises at every measurement, from 19 applications at baseline to 44 applications at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that Saturday permit appointments shows a sustained increase in completed applications from baseline through follow-up.
Saturday permit appointments: 19, 26, 35, 44 applications; weekday-only appointments: 43, 39, 35, 31 applications
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical humanities investigation of art students, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records cross-period comparisons for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that the gap in cross-period comparisons between theme-based gallery routes and chronological routes narrows across the four measurements.
The team claims that the gap in cross-period comparisons between theme-based gallery routes and chronological routes narrows across the four measurements.
Across the ordered measurements: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 comparisons at baseline to 16 comparisons at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
Across the ordered measurements: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 comparisons at baseline to 16 comparisons at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that the gap in cross-period comparisons between theme-based gallery routes and chronological routes narrows across the four measurements.
theme-based gallery routes: 26, 34, 44, 54 comparisons; chronological routes: 50, 46, 42, 38 comparisons
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical literature investigation of Eren in an original story, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records trust in the group for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that sharing the damaged ledger exceeds concealing its missing pages in trust in the group by follow-up.
The team claims that sharing the damaged ledger exceeds concealing its missing pages in trust in the group by follow-up.
Across the ordered measurements: At follow-up, sharing the damaged ledger reaches 49 choices, exceeding concealing its missing pages at 45 choices.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
Across the ordered measurements: At follow-up, sharing the damaged ledger reaches 49 choices, exceeding concealing its missing pages at 45 choices. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that sharing the damaged ledger exceeds concealing its missing pages in trust in the group by follow-up.
sharing the damaged ledger: 33, 37, 43, 49 choices; concealing its missing pages: 57, 53, 49, 45 choices
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical science investigation of forest moss samples, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records retained moisture for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that porous shade cover changes more across the measurement period than open exposure.
The team claims that porous shade cover changes more across the measurement period than open exposure.
Across the ordered measurements: porous shade cover changes by 19 %, while open exposure changes by 12 % in the opposite direction.
The selected values directly illustrate the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly illustrates the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
Across the ordered measurements: porous shade cover changes by 19 %, while open exposure changes by 12 % in the opposite direction. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that porous shade cover changes more across the measurement period than open exposure.
porous shade cover: 20, 25, 32, 39 %; open exposure: 44, 40, 36, 32 %
The prompt asks for evidence that illustrates the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical history social studies investigation of housing applicants, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records on-time responses for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that plain-language deadlines shows a sustained increase in on-time responses from baseline through follow-up.
The team claims that plain-language deadlines shows a sustained increase in on-time responses from baseline through follow-up.
Across the ordered measurements: plain-language deadlines rises at every measurement, from 27 % at baseline to 49 % at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
Across the ordered measurements: plain-language deadlines rises at every measurement, from 27 % at baseline to 49 % at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that plain-language deadlines shows a sustained increase in on-time responses from baseline through follow-up.
plain-language deadlines: 27, 33, 41, 49 %; legalistic deadlines: 51, 47, 43, 39 %
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical humanities investigation of viewers of one silent scene, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records cautious character descriptions for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that the gap in cautious character descriptions between a cautious musical score and an urgent musical score narrows across the four measurements.
The team claims that the gap in cautious character descriptions between a cautious musical score and an urgent musical score narrows across the four measurements.
Across the ordered measurements: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 % at baseline to 13 % at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
Across the ordered measurements: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 % at baseline to 13 % at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that the gap in cautious character descriptions between a cautious musical score and an urgent musical score narrows across the four measurements.
a cautious musical score: 34, 41, 50, 59 %; an urgent musical score: 58, 54, 50, 46 %
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical literature investigation of Asha in an original story, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records respect for shared history for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that mending the banner visibly exceeds replacing it without a trace in respect for shared history by follow-up.
The team claims that mending the banner visibly exceeds replacing it without a trace in respect for shared history by follow-up.
Across the ordered measurements: At follow-up, mending the banner visibly reaches 49 images, exceeding replacing it without a trace at 33 images.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Across the ordered measurements: At follow-up, mending the banner visibly reaches 49 images, exceeding replacing it without a trace at 33 images. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that mending the banner visibly exceeds replacing it without a trace in respect for shared history by follow-up.
mending the banner visibly: 21, 29, 39, 49 images; replacing it without a trace: 45, 41, 37, 33 images
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical science investigation of stored seeds, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records post-thaw germination for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that sealed packets changes more across the measurement period than porous packets.
The team claims that sealed packets changes more across the measurement period than porous packets.
Across the ordered measurements: sealed packets changes by 16 %, while porous packets changes by 12 % in the opposite direction.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
Across the ordered measurements: sealed packets changes by 16 %, while porous packets changes by 12 % in the opposite direction. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that sealed packets changes more across the measurement period than porous packets.
sealed packets: 28, 32, 38, 44 %; porous packets: 52, 48, 44, 40 %
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical history social studies investigation of first-time respondents, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records requests for guidance for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that rotating neighborhood desks shows a sustained increase in requests for guidance from baseline through follow-up.
The team claims that rotating neighborhood desks shows a sustained increase in requests for guidance from baseline through follow-up.
Across the ordered measurements: rotating neighborhood desks rises at every measurement, from 35 requests at baseline to 54 requests at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
Across the ordered measurements: rotating neighborhood desks rises at every measurement, from 35 requests at baseline to 54 requests at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that rotating neighborhood desks shows a sustained increase in requests for guidance from baseline through follow-up.
rotating neighborhood desks: 35, 40, 47, 54 requests; one central desk: 59, 55, 51, 47 requests
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical humanities investigation of poetry students, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records delivery-specific observations for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that the gap in delivery-specific observations between several reader recordings and one official recording narrows across the four measurements.
The team claims that the gap in delivery-specific observations between several reader recordings and one official recording narrows across the four measurements.
Across the ordered measurements: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 observations at baseline to 10 observations at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Across the ordered measurements: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 observations at baseline to 10 observations at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that the gap in delivery-specific observations between several reader recordings and one official recording narrows across the four measurements.
several reader recordings: 22, 28, 36, 44 observations; one official recording: 46, 42, 38, 34 observations
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical literature investigation of Theo in an original story, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records confidence in her guidance for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that handing Amara the lantern exceeds keeping the lantern in confidence in her guidance by follow-up.
The team claims that handing Amara the lantern exceeds keeping the lantern in confidence in her guidance by follow-up.
Across the ordered measurements: At follow-up, handing Amara the lantern reaches 54 gestures, exceeding keeping the lantern at 41 gestures.
The selected values directly illustrate the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly illustrates the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
Across the ordered measurements: At follow-up, handing Amara the lantern reaches 54 gestures, exceeding keeping the lantern at 41 gestures. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that handing Amara the lantern exceeds keeping the lantern in confidence in her guidance by follow-up.
handing Amara the lantern: 29, 36, 45, 54 gestures; keeping the lantern: 53, 49, 45, 41 gestures
The prompt asks for evidence that illustrates the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical science investigation of aquatic insects, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records insects retained after high flow for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that flat stream stones changes more across the measurement period than rounded stream stones.
The team claims that flat stream stones changes more across the measurement period than rounded stream stones.
Across the ordered measurements: flat stream stones changes by 28 %, while rounded stream stones changes by 12 % in the opposite direction.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
Across the ordered measurements: flat stream stones changes by 28 %, while rounded stream stones changes by 12 % in the opposite direction. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that flat stream stones changes more across the measurement period than rounded stream stones.
flat stream stones: 36, 44, 54, 64 %; rounded stream stones: 60, 56, 52, 48 %
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical history social studies investigation of transit riders, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records trips ending near the clinic for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that a route extended near a clinic shows a sustained increase in trips ending near the clinic from baseline through follow-up.
The team claims that a route extended near a clinic shows a sustained increase in trips ending near the clinic from baseline through follow-up.
Across the ordered measurements: a route extended near a clinic rises at every measurement, from 23 trips at baseline to 39 trips at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
Across the ordered measurements: a route extended near a clinic rises at every measurement, from 23 trips at baseline to 39 trips at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that a route extended near a clinic shows a sustained increase in trips ending near the clinic from baseline through follow-up.
a route extended near a clinic: 23, 27, 33, 39 trips; the earlier route: 47, 43, 39, 35 trips
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical humanities investigation of portrait viewers, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records identified revisions for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that the gap in identified revisions between infrared underdrawing images and finished-image-only displays narrows across the four measurements.
The team claims that the gap in identified revisions between infrared underdrawing images and finished-image-only displays narrows across the four measurements.
Across the ordered measurements: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 revisions at baseline to 7 revisions at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
Across the ordered measurements: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 revisions at baseline to 7 revisions at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that the gap in identified revisions between infrared underdrawing images and finished-image-only displays narrows across the four measurements.
infrared underdrawing images: 30, 35, 42, 49 revisions; finished-image-only displays: 54, 50, 46, 42 revisions
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical literature investigation of Sora in an original play, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records openness to improvisation for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that allowing street rhythm into the finale exceeds closing out every outside sound in openness to improvisation by follow-up.
The team claims that allowing street rhythm into the finale exceeds closing out every outside sound in openness to improvisation by follow-up.
Across the ordered measurements: At follow-up, allowing street rhythm into the finale reaches 59 stage choices, exceeding closing out every outside sound at 49 stage choices.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
Across the ordered measurements: At follow-up, allowing street rhythm into the finale reaches 59 stage choices, exceeding closing out every outside sound at 49 stage choices. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that allowing street rhythm into the finale exceeds closing out every outside sound in openness to improvisation by follow-up.
allowing street rhythm into the finale: 37, 43, 51, 59 stage choices; closing out every outside sound: 61, 57, 53, 49 stage choices
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical science investigation of garden plots, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records afternoon humidity for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that dense ground cover changes more across the measurement period than bare soil.
The team claims that dense ground cover changes more across the measurement period than bare soil.
Across the ordered measurements: dense ground cover changes by 25 %, while bare soil changes by 12 % in the opposite direction.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Across the ordered measurements: dense ground cover changes by 25 %, while bare soil changes by 12 % in the opposite direction. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that dense ground cover changes more across the measurement period than bare soil.
dense ground cover: 24, 31, 40, 49 %; bare soil: 48, 44, 40, 36 %
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical history social studies investigation of archive users, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records successful record searches for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that bilingual transcripts shows a sustained increase in successful record searches from baseline through follow-up.
The team claims that bilingual transcripts shows a sustained increase in successful record searches from baseline through follow-up.
Across the ordered measurements: bilingual transcripts rises at every measurement, from 31 % at baseline to 59 % at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Across the ordered measurements: bilingual transcripts rises at every measurement, from 31 % at baseline to 59 % at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that bilingual transcripts shows a sustained increase in successful record searches from baseline through follow-up.
bilingual transcripts: 31, 39, 49, 59 %; single-language metadata: 55, 51, 47, 43 %
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical humanities investigation of theater audiences, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records noticed performer interactions for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that the gap in noticed performer interactions between seats surrounding the stage and fixed front-facing rows narrows across the four measurements.
The team claims that the gap in noticed performer interactions between seats surrounding the stage and fixed front-facing rows narrows across the four measurements.
Across the ordered measurements: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 % at baseline to 4 % at follow-up.
The selected values directly illustrate the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly illustrates the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
Across the ordered measurements: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 % at baseline to 4 % at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that the gap in noticed performer interactions between seats surrounding the stage and fixed front-facing rows narrows across the four measurements.
seats surrounding the stage: 18, 22, 28, 34 %; fixed front-facing rows: 42, 38, 34, 30 %
The prompt asks for evidence that illustrates the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical literature investigation of Noor in an original story, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records openness to shared discovery for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that opening unscheduled viewing slots exceeds restricting every slot in openness to shared discovery by follow-up.
The team claims that opening unscheduled viewing slots exceeds restricting every slot in openness to shared discovery by follow-up.
Across the ordered measurements: At follow-up, opening unscheduled viewing slots reaches 44 decisions, exceeding restricting every slot at 37 decisions.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
Across the ordered measurements: At follow-up, opening unscheduled viewing slots reaches 44 decisions, exceeding restricting every slot at 37 decisions. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that opening unscheduled viewing slots exceeds restricting every slot in openness to shared discovery by follow-up.
opening unscheduled viewing slots: 25, 30, 37, 44 decisions; restricting every slot: 49, 45, 41, 37 decisions
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical science investigation of building tiles, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records strength after wetting for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that high recycled-glass content changes more across the measurement period than low recycled-glass content.
The team claims that high recycled-glass content changes more across the measurement period than low recycled-glass content.
Across the ordered measurements: high recycled-glass content changes by 22 %, while low recycled-glass content changes by 12 % in the opposite direction.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
Across the ordered measurements: high recycled-glass content changes by 22 %, while low recycled-glass content changes by 12 % in the opposite direction. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that high recycled-glass content changes more across the measurement period than low recycled-glass content.
high recycled-glass content: 32, 38, 46, 54 %; low recycled-glass content: 56, 52, 48, 44 %
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical history social studies investigation of meeting attendees, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records question-period participation for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that a portable hearing loop shows a sustained increase in question-period participation from baseline through follow-up.
The team claims that a portable hearing loop shows a sustained increase in question-period participation from baseline through follow-up.
Across the ordered measurements: a portable hearing loop rises at every measurement, from 19 questions at baseline to 44 questions at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
Across the ordered measurements: a portable hearing loop rises at every measurement, from 19 questions at baseline to 44 questions at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that a portable hearing loop shows a sustained increase in question-period participation from baseline through follow-up.
a portable hearing loop: 19, 26, 35, 44 questions; standard room audio: 43, 39, 35, 31 questions
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical humanities investigation of photography viewers, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The fictional dataset records distinct interpretations for two named conditions across four measurements. The team claims that the gap in distinct interpretations between captions shown after viewing and captions shown before viewing narrows across the four measurements.
The team claims that the gap in distinct interpretations between captions shown after viewing and captions shown before viewing narrows across the four measurements.
Across the ordered measurements: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 interpretations at baseline to 16 interpretations at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
Across the ordered measurements: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 interpretations at baseline to 16 interpretations at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that the gap in distinct interpretations between captions shown after viewing and captions shown before viewing narrows across the four measurements.
captions shown after viewing: 26, 34, 44, 54 interpretations; captions shown before viewing: 50, 46, 42, 38 interpretations
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
Keyboard: use Tab to move, arrow keys to change answer choices, and Enter to check an answer.
Use the results to decide what to review before your next attempt.
No mistakes this time. Excellent work.