Practice
Fifty original digital-SAT-style Command of Evidence questions for Topic 3-8: Integrating Text and Data.
In a hypothetical history social studies investigation of full-time workers, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the table. The text specifies that only measurements for Saturday workshops and the comparison with weekday-morning workshops should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that Saturday workshops shows a sustained increase in registrations from baseline through follow-up.
The team claims that Saturday workshops shows a sustained increase in registrations from baseline through follow-up.
In the text-qualified analysis: Saturday workshops rises at every measurement, from 33 people at baseline to 49 people at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
In the text-qualified analysis: Saturday workshops rises at every measurement, from 33 people at baseline to 49 people at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that Saturday workshops shows a sustained increase in registrations from baseline through follow-up.
Saturday workshops: 33, 37, 43, 49 people; weekday-morning workshops: 57, 53, 49, 45 people
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical science investigation of delivery robots on wet ramps, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the table. The text specifies that only measurements for textured wheel bands and the comparison with smooth wheel bands should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that the gap in successful climbs between textured wheel bands and smooth wheel bands narrows across the four measurements.
The team claims that the gap in successful climbs between textured wheel bands and smooth wheel bands narrows across the four measurements.
In the text-qualified analysis: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 % at baseline to 7 % at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
In the text-qualified analysis: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 % at baseline to 7 % at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that the gap in successful climbs between textured wheel bands and smooth wheel bands narrows across the four measurements.
textured wheel bands: 20, 25, 32, 39 %; smooth wheel bands: 44, 40, 36, 32 %
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical history social studies investigation of library visitors, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the table. The text specifies that only measurements for evening opening hours and the comparison with daytime-only hours should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that evening opening hours exceeds daytime-only hours in completed visits by follow-up.
The team claims that evening opening hours exceeds daytime-only hours in completed visits by follow-up.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, evening opening hours reaches 49 visits, exceeding daytime-only hours at 39 visits.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, evening opening hours reaches 49 visits, exceeding daytime-only hours at 39 visits. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that evening opening hours exceeds daytime-only hours in completed visits by follow-up.
evening opening hours: 27, 33, 41, 49 visits; daytime-only hours: 51, 47, 43, 39 visits
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical humanities investigation of museum visitors, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the table. The text specifies that only measurements for layer-by-layer labels and the comparison with single summary labels should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that layer-by-layer labels changes more across the measurement period than single summary labels.
The team claims that layer-by-layer labels changes more across the measurement period than single summary labels.
In the text-qualified analysis: layer-by-layer labels changes by 25 %, while single summary labels changes by 12 % in the opposite direction.
The selected values directly illustrate the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly illustrates the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
In the text-qualified analysis: layer-by-layer labels changes by 25 %, while single summary labels changes by 12 % in the opposite direction. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that layer-by-layer labels changes more across the measurement period than single summary labels.
layer-by-layer labels: 34, 41, 50, 59 %; single summary labels: 58, 54, 50, 46 %
The prompt asks for evidence that illustrates the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical literature investigation of Mira in an original story, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the table. The text specifies that only measurements for speaking before the council and the comparison with speaking privately to Ivo should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that speaking before the council remains below speaking privately to Ivo through follow-up for candor about uncertainty.
The team claims that speaking before the council remains below speaking privately to Ivo through follow-up for candor about uncertainty.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, speaking before the council is 49 instances, which is above speaking privately to Ivo at 33 instances.
The selected values directly challenge the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly challenges the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, speaking before the council is 49 instances, which is above speaking privately to Ivo at 33 instances. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that speaking before the council remains below speaking privately to Ivo through follow-up for candor about uncertainty.
speaking before the council: 21, 29, 39, 49 instances; speaking privately to Ivo: 45, 41, 37, 33 instances
The prompt asks for evidence that challenges the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical science investigation of coastal seedlings, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the table. The text specifies that only measurements for low-salt irrigation and the comparison with high-salt irrigation should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that the gap in surviving leaves between low-salt irrigation and high-salt irrigation narrows across the four measurements.
The team claims that the gap in surviving leaves between low-salt irrigation and high-salt irrigation narrows across the four measurements.
In the text-qualified analysis: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 leaves at baseline to 4 leaves at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
In the text-qualified analysis: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 leaves at baseline to 4 leaves at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that the gap in surviving leaves between low-salt irrigation and high-salt irrigation narrows across the four measurements.
low-salt irrigation: 28, 32, 38, 44 leaves; high-salt irrigation: 52, 48, 44, 40 leaves
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical history social studies investigation of first-time voters, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the table. The text specifies that only measurements for a translated guide and the comparison with a single-language guide should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that a translated guide exceeds a single-language guide in correctly completed sample ballots by follow-up.
The team claims that a translated guide exceeds a single-language guide in correctly completed sample ballots by follow-up.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, a translated guide reaches 54 %, exceeding a single-language guide at 47 %.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, a translated guide reaches 54 %, exceeding a single-language guide at 47 %. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that a translated guide exceeds a single-language guide in correctly completed sample ballots by follow-up.
a translated guide: 35, 40, 47, 54 %; a single-language guide: 59, 55, 51, 47 %
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical humanities investigation of student percussionists, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the table. The text specifies that only measurements for rhythm-first rehearsal and the comparison with melody-first rehearsal should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that rhythm-first rehearsal changes more across the measurement period than melody-first rehearsal.
The team claims that rhythm-first rehearsal changes more across the measurement period than melody-first rehearsal.
In the text-qualified analysis: rhythm-first rehearsal changes by 22 %, while melody-first rehearsal changes by 12 % in the opposite direction.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
In the text-qualified analysis: rhythm-first rehearsal changes by 22 %, while melody-first rehearsal changes by 12 % in the opposite direction. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that rhythm-first rehearsal changes more across the measurement period than melody-first rehearsal.
rhythm-first rehearsal: 22, 28, 36, 44 %; melody-first rehearsal: 46, 42, 38, 34 %
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical literature investigation of Jonas in an original story, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the table. The text specifies that only measurements for displaying the patched kite and the comparison with hiding it in the shed should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that displaying the patched kite shows a sustained increase in acceptance of imperfection from baseline through follow-up.
The team claims that displaying the patched kite shows a sustained increase in acceptance of imperfection from baseline through follow-up.
In the text-qualified analysis: displaying the patched kite rises at every measurement, from 29 details at baseline to 54 details at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
In the text-qualified analysis: displaying the patched kite rises at every measurement, from 29 details at baseline to 54 details at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that displaying the patched kite shows a sustained increase in acceptance of imperfection from baseline through follow-up.
displaying the patched kite: 29, 36, 45, 54 details; hiding it in the shed: 53, 49, 45, 41 details
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical science investigation of identical roof tiles, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the table. The text specifies that only measurements for reflective coating and the comparison with plain coating should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that reflective coating remains below plain coating through follow-up for retained heat.
The team claims that reflective coating remains below plain coating through follow-up for retained heat.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, reflective coating is 64 °C, which is above plain coating at 48 °C.
The selected values directly challenge the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly challenges the supplied claim.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, reflective coating is 64 °C, which is above plain coating at 48 °C. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that reflective coating remains below plain coating through follow-up for retained heat.
reflective coating: 36, 44, 54, 64 °C; plain coating: 60, 56, 52, 48 °C
The prompt asks for evidence that challenges the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical history social studies investigation of rural archive donors, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the table. The text specifies that only measurements for mobile scanning visits and the comparison with city-only scanning should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that mobile scanning visits exceeds city-only scanning in documents contributed by follow-up.
The team claims that mobile scanning visits exceeds city-only scanning in documents contributed by follow-up.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, mobile scanning visits reaches 39 items, exceeding city-only scanning at 35 items.
The selected values directly illustrate the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly illustrates the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, mobile scanning visits reaches 39 items, exceeding city-only scanning at 35 items. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that mobile scanning visits exceeds city-only scanning in documents contributed by follow-up.
mobile scanning visits: 23, 27, 33, 39 items; city-only scanning: 47, 43, 39, 35 items
The prompt asks for evidence that illustrates the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical humanities investigation of gallery visitors, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the table. The text specifies that only measurements for touchable material samples and the comparison with text-only labels should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that touchable material samples changes more across the measurement period than text-only labels.
The team claims that touchable material samples changes more across the measurement period than text-only labels.
In the text-qualified analysis: touchable material samples changes by 19 comments, while text-only labels changes by 12 comments in the opposite direction.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
In the text-qualified analysis: touchable material samples changes by 19 comments, while text-only labels changes by 12 comments in the opposite direction. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that touchable material samples changes more across the measurement period than text-only labels.
touchable material samples: 30, 35, 42, 49 comments; text-only labels: 54, 50, 46, 42 comments
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical literature investigation of Sana in an original story, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the table. The text specifies that only measurements for moving a new colleague's chair closer and the comparison with leaving the chair apart should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that moving a new colleague's chair closer shows a sustained increase in readiness to collaborate from baseline through follow-up.
The team claims that moving a new colleague's chair closer shows a sustained increase in readiness to collaborate from baseline through follow-up.
In the text-qualified analysis: moving a new colleague's chair closer rises at every measurement, from 37 actions at baseline to 59 actions at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
In the text-qualified analysis: moving a new colleague's chair closer rises at every measurement, from 37 actions at baseline to 59 actions at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that moving a new colleague's chair closer shows a sustained increase in readiness to collaborate from baseline through follow-up.
moving a new colleague's chair closer: 37, 43, 51, 59 actions; leaving the chair apart: 61, 57, 53, 49 actions
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical science investigation of solitary bees, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the table. The text specifies that only measurements for east-facing nest openings and the comparison with west-facing openings should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that the gap in occupied nesting tubes between east-facing nest openings and west-facing openings narrows across the four measurements.
The team claims that the gap in occupied nesting tubes between east-facing nest openings and west-facing openings narrows across the four measurements.
In the text-qualified analysis: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 % at baseline to 13 % at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
In the text-qualified analysis: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 % at baseline to 13 % at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that the gap in occupied nesting tubes between east-facing nest openings and west-facing openings narrows across the four measurements.
east-facing nest openings: 24, 31, 40, 49 %; west-facing openings: 48, 44, 40, 36 %
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical history social studies investigation of hourly workers, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the table. The text specifies that only measurements for Saturday permit appointments and the comparison with weekday-only appointments should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that Saturday permit appointments remains below weekday-only appointments through follow-up for completed applications.
The team claims that Saturday permit appointments remains below weekday-only appointments through follow-up for completed applications.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, Saturday permit appointments is 59 applications, which is above weekday-only appointments at 43 applications.
The selected values directly challenge the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly challenges the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, Saturday permit appointments is 59 applications, which is above weekday-only appointments at 43 applications. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that Saturday permit appointments remains below weekday-only appointments through follow-up for completed applications.
Saturday permit appointments: 31, 39, 49, 59 applications; weekday-only appointments: 55, 51, 47, 43 applications
The prompt asks for evidence that challenges the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical humanities investigation of art students, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the table. The text specifies that only measurements for theme-based gallery routes and the comparison with chronological routes should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that theme-based gallery routes changes more across the measurement period than chronological routes.
The team claims that theme-based gallery routes changes more across the measurement period than chronological routes.
In the text-qualified analysis: theme-based gallery routes changes by 16 comparisons, while chronological routes changes by 12 comparisons in the opposite direction.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
In the text-qualified analysis: theme-based gallery routes changes by 16 comparisons, while chronological routes changes by 12 comparisons in the opposite direction. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that theme-based gallery routes changes more across the measurement period than chronological routes.
theme-based gallery routes: 18, 22, 28, 34 comparisons; chronological routes: 42, 38, 34, 30 comparisons
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical literature investigation of Eren in an original story, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the table. The text specifies that only measurements for sharing the damaged ledger and the comparison with concealing its missing pages should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that sharing the damaged ledger shows a sustained increase in trust in the group from baseline through follow-up.
The team claims that sharing the damaged ledger shows a sustained increase in trust in the group from baseline through follow-up.
In the text-qualified analysis: sharing the damaged ledger rises at every measurement, from 25 choices at baseline to 44 choices at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
In the text-qualified analysis: sharing the damaged ledger rises at every measurement, from 25 choices at baseline to 44 choices at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that sharing the damaged ledger shows a sustained increase in trust in the group from baseline through follow-up.
sharing the damaged ledger: 25, 30, 37, 44 choices; concealing its missing pages: 49, 45, 41, 37 choices
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical science investigation of forest moss samples, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the bar graph. The text specifies that only measurements for porous shade cover and the comparison with open exposure should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that the gap in retained moisture between porous shade cover and open exposure narrows across the four measurements.
The team claims that the gap in retained moisture between porous shade cover and open exposure narrows across the four measurements.
In the text-qualified analysis: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 % at baseline to 10 % at follow-up.
The selected values directly illustrate the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly illustrates the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
In the text-qualified analysis: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 % at baseline to 10 % at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that the gap in retained moisture between porous shade cover and open exposure narrows across the four measurements.
porous shade cover: 32, 38, 46, 54 %; open exposure: 56, 52, 48, 44 %
The prompt asks for evidence that illustrates the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical history social studies investigation of housing applicants, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the bar graph. The text specifies that only measurements for plain-language deadlines and the comparison with legalistic deadlines should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that plain-language deadlines exceeds legalistic deadlines in on-time responses by follow-up.
The team claims that plain-language deadlines exceeds legalistic deadlines in on-time responses by follow-up.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, plain-language deadlines reaches 44 %, exceeding legalistic deadlines at 31 %.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, plain-language deadlines reaches 44 %, exceeding legalistic deadlines at 31 %. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that plain-language deadlines exceeds legalistic deadlines in on-time responses by follow-up.
plain-language deadlines: 19, 26, 35, 44 %; legalistic deadlines: 43, 39, 35, 31 %
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical humanities investigation of viewers of one silent scene, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the bar graph. The text specifies that only measurements for a cautious musical score and the comparison with an urgent musical score should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that a cautious musical score remains below an urgent musical score through follow-up for cautious character descriptions.
The team claims that a cautious musical score remains below an urgent musical score through follow-up for cautious character descriptions.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, a cautious musical score is 54 %, which is above an urgent musical score at 38 %.
The selected values directly challenge the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly challenges the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, a cautious musical score is 54 %, which is above an urgent musical score at 38 %. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that a cautious musical score remains below an urgent musical score through follow-up for cautious character descriptions.
a cautious musical score: 26, 34, 44, 54 %; an urgent musical score: 50, 46, 42, 38 %
The prompt asks for evidence that challenges the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical literature investigation of Asha in an original story, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the bar graph. The text specifies that only measurements for mending the banner visibly and the comparison with replacing it without a trace should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that mending the banner visibly shows a sustained increase in respect for shared history from baseline through follow-up.
The team claims that mending the banner visibly shows a sustained increase in respect for shared history from baseline through follow-up.
In the text-qualified analysis: mending the banner visibly rises at every measurement, from 33 images at baseline to 49 images at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
In the text-qualified analysis: mending the banner visibly rises at every measurement, from 33 images at baseline to 49 images at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that mending the banner visibly shows a sustained increase in respect for shared history from baseline through follow-up.
mending the banner visibly: 33, 37, 43, 49 images; replacing it without a trace: 57, 53, 49, 45 images
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical science investigation of stored seeds, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the bar graph. The text specifies that only measurements for sealed packets and the comparison with porous packets should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that the gap in post-thaw germination between sealed packets and porous packets narrows across the four measurements.
The team claims that the gap in post-thaw germination between sealed packets and porous packets narrows across the four measurements.
In the text-qualified analysis: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 % at baseline to 7 % at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
In the text-qualified analysis: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 % at baseline to 7 % at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that the gap in post-thaw germination between sealed packets and porous packets narrows across the four measurements.
sealed packets: 20, 25, 32, 39 %; porous packets: 44, 40, 36, 32 %
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical history social studies investigation of first-time respondents, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the bar graph. The text specifies that only measurements for rotating neighborhood desks and the comparison with one central desk should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that rotating neighborhood desks exceeds one central desk in requests for guidance by follow-up.
The team claims that rotating neighborhood desks exceeds one central desk in requests for guidance by follow-up.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, rotating neighborhood desks reaches 49 requests, exceeding one central desk at 39 requests.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, rotating neighborhood desks reaches 49 requests, exceeding one central desk at 39 requests. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that rotating neighborhood desks exceeds one central desk in requests for guidance by follow-up.
rotating neighborhood desks: 27, 33, 41, 49 requests; one central desk: 51, 47, 43, 39 requests
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical humanities investigation of poetry students, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the bar graph. The text specifies that only measurements for several reader recordings and the comparison with one official recording should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that several reader recordings changes more across the measurement period than one official recording.
The team claims that several reader recordings changes more across the measurement period than one official recording.
In the text-qualified analysis: several reader recordings changes by 25 observations, while one official recording changes by 12 observations in the opposite direction.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
In the text-qualified analysis: several reader recordings changes by 25 observations, while one official recording changes by 12 observations in the opposite direction. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that several reader recordings changes more across the measurement period than one official recording.
several reader recordings: 34, 41, 50, 59 observations; one official recording: 58, 54, 50, 46 observations
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical literature investigation of Theo in an original story, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the bar graph. The text specifies that only measurements for handing Amara the lantern and the comparison with keeping the lantern should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that handing Amara the lantern remains below keeping the lantern through follow-up for confidence in her guidance.
The team claims that handing Amara the lantern remains below keeping the lantern through follow-up for confidence in her guidance.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, handing Amara the lantern is 49 gestures, which is above keeping the lantern at 33 gestures.
The selected values directly challenge the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly challenges the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, handing Amara the lantern is 49 gestures, which is above keeping the lantern at 33 gestures. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that handing Amara the lantern remains below keeping the lantern through follow-up for confidence in her guidance.
handing Amara the lantern: 21, 29, 39, 49 gestures; keeping the lantern: 45, 41, 37, 33 gestures
The prompt asks for evidence that challenges the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical science investigation of aquatic insects, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the bar graph. The text specifies that only measurements for flat stream stones and the comparison with rounded stream stones should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that the gap in insects retained after high flow between flat stream stones and rounded stream stones narrows across the four measurements.
The team claims that the gap in insects retained after high flow between flat stream stones and rounded stream stones narrows across the four measurements.
In the text-qualified analysis: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 % at baseline to 4 % at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
In the text-qualified analysis: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 % at baseline to 4 % at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that the gap in insects retained after high flow between flat stream stones and rounded stream stones narrows across the four measurements.
flat stream stones: 28, 32, 38, 44 %; rounded stream stones: 52, 48, 44, 40 %
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical history social studies investigation of transit riders, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the bar graph. The text specifies that only measurements for a route extended near a clinic and the comparison with the earlier route should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that a route extended near a clinic exceeds the earlier route in trips ending near the clinic by follow-up.
The team claims that a route extended near a clinic exceeds the earlier route in trips ending near the clinic by follow-up.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, a route extended near a clinic reaches 54 trips, exceeding the earlier route at 47 trips.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, a route extended near a clinic reaches 54 trips, exceeding the earlier route at 47 trips. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that a route extended near a clinic exceeds the earlier route in trips ending near the clinic by follow-up.
a route extended near a clinic: 35, 40, 47, 54 trips; the earlier route: 59, 55, 51, 47 trips
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical humanities investigation of portrait viewers, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the bar graph. The text specifies that only measurements for infrared underdrawing images and the comparison with finished-image-only displays should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that infrared underdrawing images changes more across the measurement period than finished-image-only displays.
The team claims that infrared underdrawing images changes more across the measurement period than finished-image-only displays.
In the text-qualified analysis: infrared underdrawing images changes by 22 revisions, while finished-image-only displays changes by 12 revisions in the opposite direction.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
In the text-qualified analysis: infrared underdrawing images changes by 22 revisions, while finished-image-only displays changes by 12 revisions in the opposite direction. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that infrared underdrawing images changes more across the measurement period than finished-image-only displays.
infrared underdrawing images: 22, 28, 36, 44 revisions; finished-image-only displays: 46, 42, 38, 34 revisions
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical literature investigation of Sora in an original play, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the bar graph. The text specifies that only measurements for allowing street rhythm into the finale and the comparison with closing out every outside sound should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that allowing street rhythm into the finale shows a sustained increase in openness to improvisation from baseline through follow-up.
The team claims that allowing street rhythm into the finale shows a sustained increase in openness to improvisation from baseline through follow-up.
In the text-qualified analysis: allowing street rhythm into the finale rises at every measurement, from 29 stage choices at baseline to 54 stage choices at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
In the text-qualified analysis: allowing street rhythm into the finale rises at every measurement, from 29 stage choices at baseline to 54 stage choices at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that allowing street rhythm into the finale shows a sustained increase in openness to improvisation from baseline through follow-up.
allowing street rhythm into the finale: 29, 36, 45, 54 stage choices; closing out every outside sound: 53, 49, 45, 41 stage choices
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical science investigation of garden plots, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the bar graph. The text specifies that only measurements for dense ground cover and the comparison with bare soil should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that dense ground cover remains below bare soil through follow-up for afternoon humidity.
The team claims that dense ground cover remains below bare soil through follow-up for afternoon humidity.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, dense ground cover is 64 %, which is above bare soil at 48 %.
The selected values directly challenge the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly challenges the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, dense ground cover is 64 %, which is above bare soil at 48 %. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that dense ground cover remains below bare soil through follow-up for afternoon humidity.
dense ground cover: 36, 44, 54, 64 %; bare soil: 60, 56, 52, 48 %
The prompt asks for evidence that challenges the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical history social studies investigation of archive users, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the bar graph. The text specifies that only measurements for bilingual transcripts and the comparison with single-language metadata should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that bilingual transcripts exceeds single-language metadata in successful record searches by follow-up.
The team claims that bilingual transcripts exceeds single-language metadata in successful record searches by follow-up.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, bilingual transcripts reaches 39 %, exceeding single-language metadata at 35 %.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, bilingual transcripts reaches 39 %, exceeding single-language metadata at 35 %. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that bilingual transcripts exceeds single-language metadata in successful record searches by follow-up.
bilingual transcripts: 23, 27, 33, 39 %; single-language metadata: 47, 43, 39, 35 %
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical humanities investigation of theater audiences, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the bar graph. The text specifies that only measurements for seats surrounding the stage and the comparison with fixed front-facing rows should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that seats surrounding the stage changes more across the measurement period than fixed front-facing rows.
The team claims that seats surrounding the stage changes more across the measurement period than fixed front-facing rows.
In the text-qualified analysis: seats surrounding the stage changes by 19 %, while fixed front-facing rows changes by 12 % in the opposite direction.
The selected values directly illustrate the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly illustrates the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
In the text-qualified analysis: seats surrounding the stage changes by 19 %, while fixed front-facing rows changes by 12 % in the opposite direction. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that seats surrounding the stage changes more across the measurement period than fixed front-facing rows.
seats surrounding the stage: 30, 35, 42, 49 %; fixed front-facing rows: 54, 50, 46, 42 %
The prompt asks for evidence that illustrates the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical literature investigation of Noor in an original story, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the bar graph. The text specifies that only measurements for opening unscheduled viewing slots and the comparison with restricting every slot should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that opening unscheduled viewing slots shows a sustained increase in openness to shared discovery from baseline through follow-up.
The team claims that opening unscheduled viewing slots shows a sustained increase in openness to shared discovery from baseline through follow-up.
In the text-qualified analysis: opening unscheduled viewing slots rises at every measurement, from 37 decisions at baseline to 59 decisions at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
In the text-qualified analysis: opening unscheduled viewing slots rises at every measurement, from 37 decisions at baseline to 59 decisions at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that opening unscheduled viewing slots shows a sustained increase in openness to shared discovery from baseline through follow-up.
opening unscheduled viewing slots: 37, 43, 51, 59 decisions; restricting every slot: 61, 57, 53, 49 decisions
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical science investigation of building tiles, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the bar graph. The text specifies that only measurements for high recycled-glass content and the comparison with low recycled-glass content should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that the gap in strength after wetting between high recycled-glass content and low recycled-glass content narrows across the four measurements.
The team claims that the gap in strength after wetting between high recycled-glass content and low recycled-glass content narrows across the four measurements.
In the text-qualified analysis: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 % at baseline to 13 % at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
In the text-qualified analysis: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 % at baseline to 13 % at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that the gap in strength after wetting between high recycled-glass content and low recycled-glass content narrows across the four measurements.
high recycled-glass content: 24, 31, 40, 49 %; low recycled-glass content: 48, 44, 40, 36 %
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical history social studies investigation of meeting attendees, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The text specifies that only measurements for a portable hearing loop and the comparison with standard room audio should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that a portable hearing loop remains below standard room audio through follow-up for question-period participation.
The team claims that a portable hearing loop remains below standard room audio through follow-up for question-period participation.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, a portable hearing loop is 59 questions, which is above standard room audio at 43 questions.
The selected values directly challenge the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly challenges the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, a portable hearing loop is 59 questions, which is above standard room audio at 43 questions. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that a portable hearing loop remains below standard room audio through follow-up for question-period participation.
a portable hearing loop: 31, 39, 49, 59 questions; standard room audio: 55, 51, 47, 43 questions
The prompt asks for evidence that challenges the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical humanities investigation of photography viewers, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The text specifies that only measurements for captions shown after viewing and the comparison with captions shown before viewing should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that captions shown after viewing changes more across the measurement period than captions shown before viewing.
The team claims that captions shown after viewing changes more across the measurement period than captions shown before viewing.
In the text-qualified analysis: captions shown after viewing changes by 16 interpretations, while captions shown before viewing changes by 12 interpretations in the opposite direction.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
In the text-qualified analysis: captions shown after viewing changes by 16 interpretations, while captions shown before viewing changes by 12 interpretations in the opposite direction. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that captions shown after viewing changes more across the measurement period than captions shown before viewing.
captions shown after viewing: 18, 22, 28, 34 interpretations; captions shown before viewing: 42, 38, 34, 30 interpretations
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical literature investigation of Kavi in an original story, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The text specifies that only measurements for asking Leena to redraw the route and the comparison with insisting on his damaged map should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that asking Leena to redraw the route shows a sustained increase in willingness to revise a plan from baseline through follow-up.
The team claims that asking Leena to redraw the route shows a sustained increase in willingness to revise a plan from baseline through follow-up.
In the text-qualified analysis: asking Leena to redraw the route rises at every measurement, from 25 actions at baseline to 44 actions at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
In the text-qualified analysis: asking Leena to redraw the route rises at every measurement, from 25 actions at baseline to 44 actions at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that asking Leena to redraw the route shows a sustained increase in willingness to revise a plan from baseline through follow-up.
asking Leena to redraw the route: 25, 30, 37, 44 actions; insisting on his damaged map: 49, 45, 41, 37 actions
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical science investigation of model turbine blades, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The text specifies that only measurements for textured trailing edges and the comparison with plain trailing edges should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that the gap in noise reduction between textured trailing edges and plain trailing edges narrows across the four measurements.
The team claims that the gap in noise reduction between textured trailing edges and plain trailing edges narrows across the four measurements.
In the text-qualified analysis: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 dB at baseline to 10 dB at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
In the text-qualified analysis: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 dB at baseline to 10 dB at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that the gap in noise reduction between textured trailing edges and plain trailing edges narrows across the four measurements.
textured trailing edges: 32, 38, 46, 54 dB; plain trailing edges: 56, 52, 48, 44 dB
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical history social studies investigation of neighborhood residents, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The text specifies that only measurements for comment boxes in libraries and the comparison with a city-hall-only box should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that comment boxes in libraries exceeds a city-hall-only box in postal codes represented by follow-up.
The team claims that comment boxes in libraries exceeds a city-hall-only box in postal codes represented by follow-up.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, comment boxes in libraries reaches 44 codes, exceeding a city-hall-only box at 31 codes.
The selected values directly illustrate the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly illustrates the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, comment boxes in libraries reaches 44 codes, exceeding a city-hall-only box at 31 codes. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that comment boxes in libraries exceeds a city-hall-only box in postal codes represented by follow-up.
comment boxes in libraries: 19, 26, 35, 44 codes; a city-hall-only box: 43, 39, 35, 31 codes
The prompt asks for evidence that illustrates the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical humanities investigation of ceramic fragments, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The text specifies that only measurements for organization by tool marks and the comparison with organization by color should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that organization by tool marks remains below organization by color through follow-up for cross-vessel matches.
The team claims that organization by tool marks remains below organization by color through follow-up for cross-vessel matches.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, organization by tool marks is 54 matches, which is above organization by color at 38 matches.
The selected values directly challenge the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly challenges the supplied claim.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, organization by tool marks is 54 matches, which is above organization by color at 38 matches. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that organization by tool marks remains below organization by color through follow-up for cross-vessel matches.
organization by tool marks: 26, 34, 44, 54 matches; organization by color: 50, 46, 42, 38 matches
The prompt asks for evidence that challenges the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical literature investigation of Inez in an original story, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The text specifies that only measurements for adding a substitute in pencil and the comparison with erasing the original line should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that adding a substitute in pencil shows a sustained increase in adaptation without erasure from baseline through follow-up.
The team claims that adding a substitute in pencil shows a sustained increase in adaptation without erasure from baseline through follow-up.
In the text-qualified analysis: adding a substitute in pencil rises at every measurement, from 33 details at baseline to 49 details at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
In the text-qualified analysis: adding a substitute in pencil rises at every measurement, from 33 details at baseline to 49 details at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that adding a substitute in pencil shows a sustained increase in adaptation without erasure from baseline through follow-up.
adding a substitute in pencil: 33, 37, 43, 49 details; erasing the original line: 57, 53, 49, 45 details
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical science investigation of greenhouse roots, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The text specifies that only measurements for less frequent deep watering and the comparison with daily shallow watering should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that the gap in root depth between less frequent deep watering and daily shallow watering narrows across the four measurements.
The team claims that the gap in root depth between less frequent deep watering and daily shallow watering narrows across the four measurements.
In the text-qualified analysis: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 cm at baseline to 7 cm at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
In the text-qualified analysis: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 cm at baseline to 7 cm at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that the gap in root depth between less frequent deep watering and daily shallow watering narrows across the four measurements.
less frequent deep watering: 20, 25, 32, 39 cm; daily shallow watering: 44, 40, 36, 32 cm
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical history social studies investigation of service employees, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The text specifies that only measurements for after-work voting and the comparison with noon-only voting should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that after-work voting exceeds noon-only voting in participation by follow-up.
The team claims that after-work voting exceeds noon-only voting in participation by follow-up.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, after-work voting reaches 49 voters, exceeding noon-only voting at 39 voters.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, after-work voting reaches 49 voters, exceeding noon-only voting at 39 voters. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that after-work voting exceeds noon-only voting in participation by follow-up.
after-work voting: 27, 33, 41, 49 voters; noon-only voting: 51, 47, 43, 39 voters
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical humanities investigation of theater historians, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The text specifies that only measurements for digitized page margins and the comparison with cropped central text should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that digitized page margins changes more across the measurement period than cropped central text.
The team claims that digitized page margins changes more across the measurement period than cropped central text.
In the text-qualified analysis: digitized page margins changes by 25 links, while cropped central text changes by 12 links in the opposite direction.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
In the text-qualified analysis: digitized page margins changes by 25 links, while cropped central text changes by 12 links in the opposite direction. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that digitized page margins changes more across the measurement period than cropped central text.
digitized page margins: 34, 41, 50, 59 links; cropped central text: 58, 54, 50, 46 links
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical literature investigation of Yara in an original story, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The text specifies that only measurements for showing a crossed-out draft and the comparison with showing only the final poem should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that showing a crossed-out draft remains below showing only the final poem through follow-up for willingness to teach revision.
The team claims that showing a crossed-out draft remains below showing only the final poem through follow-up for willingness to teach revision.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, showing a crossed-out draft is 49 actions, which is above showing only the final poem at 33 actions.
The selected values directly challenge the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly challenges the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, showing a crossed-out draft is 49 actions, which is above showing only the final poem at 33 actions. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that showing a crossed-out draft remains below showing only the final poem through follow-up for willingness to teach revision.
showing a crossed-out draft: 21, 29, 39, 49 actions; showing only the final poem: 45, 41, 37, 33 actions
The prompt asks for evidence that challenges the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical science investigation of deep-reef light sensors, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The text specifies that only measurements for uncovered vehicle lamps and the comparison with covered lamps should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that the gap in recorded light spikes between uncovered vehicle lamps and covered lamps narrows across the four measurements.
The team claims that the gap in recorded light spikes between uncovered vehicle lamps and covered lamps narrows across the four measurements.
In the text-qualified analysis: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 spikes at baseline to 4 spikes at follow-up.
The selected values directly illustrate the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly illustrates the supplied claim.
In the text-qualified analysis: The conditions' gap narrows from 24 spikes at baseline to 4 spikes at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that the gap in recorded light spikes between uncovered vehicle lamps and covered lamps narrows across the four measurements.
uncovered vehicle lamps: 28, 32, 38, 44 spikes; covered lamps: 52, 48, 44, 40 spikes
The prompt asks for evidence that illustrates the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical history social studies investigation of shift workers, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The text specifies that only measurements for late museum hours and the comparison with daytime-only hours should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that late museum hours exceeds daytime-only hours in weekday visits by follow-up.
The team claims that late museum hours exceeds daytime-only hours in weekday visits by follow-up.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, late museum hours reaches 54 visits, exceeding daytime-only hours at 47 visits.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, late museum hours reaches 54 visits, exceeding daytime-only hours at 47 visits. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that late museum hours exceeds daytime-only hours in weekday visits by follow-up.
late museum hours: 35, 40, 47, 54 visits; daytime-only hours: 59, 55, 51, 47 visits
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical humanities investigation of design researchers, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The text specifies that only measurements for a color-based index and the comparison with a date-based index should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that a color-based index changes more across the measurement period than a date-based index.
The team claims that a color-based index changes more across the measurement period than a date-based index.
In the text-qualified analysis: a color-based index changes by 22 connections, while a date-based index changes by 12 connections in the opposite direction.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
In the text-qualified analysis: a color-based index changes by 22 connections, while a date-based index changes by 12 connections in the opposite direction. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that a color-based index changes more across the measurement period than a date-based index.
a color-based index: 22, 28, 36, 44 connections; a date-based index: 46, 42, 38, 34 connections
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical literature investigation of Sami in an original story, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The text specifies that only measurements for rehanging the rough-toned bell and the comparison with keeping it silent should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that rehanging the rough-toned bell shows a sustained increase in revaluation of imperfection from baseline through follow-up.
The team claims that rehanging the rough-toned bell shows a sustained increase in revaluation of imperfection from baseline through follow-up.
In the text-qualified analysis: rehanging the rough-toned bell rises at every measurement, from 29 choices at baseline to 54 choices at follow-up.
The selected values directly support the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly supports the supplied claim.
In the text-qualified analysis: rehanging the rough-toned bell rises at every measurement, from 29 choices at baseline to 54 choices at follow-up. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that rehanging the rough-toned bell shows a sustained increase in revaluation of imperfection from baseline through follow-up.
rehanging the rough-toned bell: 29, 36, 45, 54 choices; keeping it silent: 53, 49, 45, 41 choices
The prompt asks for evidence that supports the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
In a hypothetical science investigation of rooftop plants, researchers recorded the original synthetic data shown in the line graph. The text specifies that only measurements for deeper soil and the comparison with shallow soil should be used to evaluate the point. The team claims that deeper soil remains below shallow soil through follow-up for living leaves after drought.
The team claims that deeper soil remains below shallow soil through follow-up for living leaves after drought.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, deeper soil is 64 %, which is above shallow soil at 48 %.
The selected values directly challenge the claim using the correct categories, series, and units.
This statement makes a mathematically valid but evidentially irrelevant comparison, so it does not establish the claimed relationship.
Correct. The statement cites the exact relevant values and directly challenges the supplied claim.
This statement uses values from a real category in the graphic, but that category or time point does not test the full claim.
This statement reads a valid value from the wrong series or reports one series without the required contrast.
In the text-qualified analysis: At follow-up, deeper soil is 64 %, which is above shallow soil at 48 %. This comparison directly addresses the relationship and scope specified in the claim.
The team claims that deeper soil remains below shallow soil through follow-up for living leaves after drought.
deeper soil: 36, 44, 54, 64 %; shallow soil: 60, 56, 52, 48 %
The prompt asks for evidence that challenges the claim; the key does so without changing categories, series, time, or units.
Keyboard: use Tab to move, arrow keys to change answer choices, and Enter to check an answer.
Use the results to decide what to review before your next attempt.
No mistakes this time. Excellent work.