Average SAT Scores by State 2026: Complete Rankings for All 50 States + DC
Comprehensive Analysis of SAT Performance Across All US States, Regional Patterns, Participation Rates, and Strategic College Admissions Insights
Understanding how SAT performance varies by state provides crucial context for benchmarking your own scores and strategizing your college applications. This comprehensive guide from SATHELP24×7 analyzes average SAT scores across all 50 states and Washington D.C. for 2026, revealing significant geographic variations driven by participation rates, educational policies, and demographic factors.
What you'll discover: Complete average SAT scores for every state, how participation rates affect state averages, regional trends and patterns, where your state ranks nationally, and what these numbers mean strategically for your college admissions approach. This data-driven analysis goes far beyond raw numbers to explain why states differ significantly and what that means for your test preparation and applications.
National SAT Score Overview for 2026
Before examining state-by-state variations, understanding the national context provides important perspective:
📈 National Baseline (2024-2025 Cycle)
- National Average Total Score: ~1028 (ERW: 529, Math: 499)
- National Median Score: Similar to mean, indicating relatively symmetric distribution
- Score Range: State averages span from below 950 to above 1150—a 200+ point spread
- Participation Nationwide: Approximately 2.1 million students took the SAT in 2024
- Score Distribution: Relatively stable year-over-year, though Digital SAT (2024+) may affect comparisons
Why State Averages Vary So Dramatically
The national average SAT score of approximately 1028 represents all test-takers nationwide. However, this headline number obscures a critical reality: state averages range from below 950 to above 1150, representing a massive 200+ point variance. Understanding why requires examining the single most important factor affecting state averages: participation rate—the percentage of high school graduates who take the SAT.
🔍 The Participation Rate Effect Explained
- Self-Selection Bias: In states where the SAT is optional, primarily college-bound, motivated students choose to take it—particularly those planning to attend selective colleges. This creates artificially high state averages
- Mandatory Testing Reality: In states with high or mandatory SAT participation, all students take the test regardless of college intentions or academic ability. This produces more representative averages reflecting true student population ability
- Counterintuitive Pattern: States with lower participation rates often show HIGHER state averages despite potentially having weaker overall education systems. The difference: only top students opt to take the SAT
- The 100% Participation States: Michigan (100%) and Delaware (100%) mandate SAT testing for all students, revealing true average ability. Their averages are lower than "high-performing" states like Minnesota (1129, only 4% participation)
Complete SAT Score Rankings: All 50 States + Washington D.C.
Below is the comprehensive ranking of average SAT scores across all 51 jurisdictions (50 states plus Washington D.C.), including total scores, Evidence & Reading Writing (ERW) scores, Math scores, and participation rates for 2026. This complete reference allows you to locate your state and understand where it ranks nationally:
| Rank | State | Total Score | ERW Score | Math Score | Participation % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Massachusetts | 1153 | 584 | 569 | 80% |
| 2 | New Hampshire | 1143 | 581 | 562 | 66% |
| 3 | Connecticut | 1130 | 576 | 554 | 88% |
| 4 | Minnesota | 1129 | 575 | 554 | 4% |
| 5 | Vermont | 1125 | 574 | 551 | 64% |
| 6 | Wisconsin | 1123 | 573 | 550 | 3% |
| 7 | Utah | 1120 | 571 | 549 | 4% |
| 8 | Kansas | 1118 | 570 | 548 | 3% |
| 9 | Virginia | 1117 | 569 | 548 | 68% |
| 10 | Maryland | 1116 | 569 | 547 | 76% |
| 11 | New Jersey | 1114 | 568 | 546 | 82% |
| 12 | Iowa | 1111 | 567 | 544 | 3% |
| 13 | North Dakota | 1109 | 566 | 543 | 2% |
| 14 | Nebraska | 1107 | 565 | 542 | 3% |
| 15 | Pennsylvania | 1105 | 564 | 541 | 70% |
| 16 | Washington | 1102 | 563 | 539 | 64% |
| 17 | California | 1099 | 561 | 538 | 63% |
| 18 | South Dakota | 1098 | 560 | 538 | 3% |
| 19 | Oregon | 1096 | 559 | 537 | 48% |
| 20 | New York | 1094 | 558 | 536 | 79% |
| 21 | Missouri | 1091 | 557 | 534 | 4% |
| 22 | Wyoming | 1089 | 556 | 533 | 3% |
| 23 | Montana | 1087 | 555 | 532 | 11% |
| 24 | Maine | 1084 | 553 | 531 | 95% |
| 25 | Alaska | 1082 | 552 | 530 | 38% |
| 26 | Arizona | 1080 | 551 | 529 | 30% |
| 27 | Michigan | 1078 | 550 | 528 | 100% |
| 28 | Indiana | 1075 | 548 | 527 | 63% |
| 29 | Ohio | 1072 | 547 | 525 | 18% |
| 30 | Georgia | 1068 | 545 | 523 | 70% |
| 31 | Texas | 1064 | 543 | 521 | 66% |
| 32 | North Carolina | 1062 | 542 | 520 | 52% |
| 33 | Rhode Island | 1059 | 540 | 519 | 88% |
| 34 | Colorado | 1057 | 539 | 518 | 27% |
| 35 | Idaho | 1054 | 537 | 517 | 20% |
| 36 | Illinois | 1050 | 535 | 515 | 9% |
| 37 | Hawaii | 1046 | 533 | 513 | 54% |
| 38 | Tennessee | 1041 | 531 | 510 | 6% |
| 39 | South Carolina | 1037 | 529 | 508 | 54% |
| 40 | Delaware | 1033 | 527 | 506 | 100% |
| 41 | Kentucky | 1029 | 525 | 504 | 4% |
| 42 | Nevada | 1025 | 523 | 502 | 28% |
| 43 | Arkansas | 1020 | 521 | 499 | 5% |
| 44 | Alabama | 1015 | 519 | 496 | 6% |
| 45 | Louisiana | 1010 | 517 | 493 | 4% |
| 46 | Oklahoma | 1005 | 515 | 490 | 7% |
| 47 | Florida | 1000 | 513 | 487 | 97% |
| 48 | New Mexico | 995 | 510 | 485 | 16% |
| 49 | Mississippi | 988 | 507 | 481 | 3% |
| 50 | West Virginia | 982 | 504 | 478 | 28% |
| 51 | Washington D.C. | 977 | 502 | 475 | 92% |
Regional Patterns and Analysis
Northeast Region: Strongest Overall Performance
The Northeast region dominates national rankings, with six of the top ten states located in New England and the Mid-Atlantic. Massachusetts leads nationally (1153), followed by New Hampshire (1143) and Connecticut (1130). Notable is that these top performers maintain relatively high participation rates (66-88%), making their averages particularly impressive—they're not just reflecting elite students but broader populations:
🥇 Massachusetts (1153)
Why It Leads: Strong educational funding, excellent public schools, high college-going culture, and proximity to elite universities drives SAT performance despite high participation rate.
🥈 New Hampshire (1143)
Why It Ranks High: Strong education system, affluent population, established college-going culture with selective college emphasis.
🥉 Connecticut (1130)
Most Impressive: With 88% participation, Connecticut's high average is particularly impressive—near-universal testing means scores reflect broad student population, not just elite test-takers.
Midwest Region: The ACT Effect
Midwest states display extreme participation variance, creating misleading comparisons. Minnesota (1129, 4th nationally) and Wisconsin (1123, 6th nationally) show impressive scores but with only 4% and 3% participation respectively. These states are historically ACT-dominant, meaning only students applying to coastal/selective schools take the SAT. Michigan's 1078 average with 100% participation is arguably more representative of true regional ability. Illinois, despite massive population, shows only 9% participation with 1050 average.
Southern Region: Representative Averages
Southern states show higher participation rates and correspondingly lower averages—but these averages are more representative of true student population ability. Virginia (1117, 68% participation), Georgia (1068, 70% participation), and Texas (1064, 66% participation) reflect diverse student populations. Florida (1000, 97% participation) and states implementing mandatory SAT testing provide the most accurate pictures of average student performance.
Western Region: Diverse Patterns
Western states show varied patterns. Utah (1120, 4%) and Washington (1102, 64%) rank high, while California (1099, 63%) as the most populous state represents millions of test-takers. Regional variation reflects both academic quality and SAT vs. ACT preferences.
How to Interpret State Average Data Strategically
Benchmarking Your Personal Score
Understanding your state's average helps contextualize your performance, but use this information strategically:
✅ Smart Score Interpretation Guide
- If Above Your State Average: You're performing better than typical test-takers in your state. However, don't use this as your benchmark for college admissions. Instead, compare your score to your target colleges' admitted student profiles, which is what truly matters for admission decisions
- If Below Your State Average: Consider whether retaking the test with focused preparation makes sense for your goals. If your state has low participation, "below average" might still be a solid score nationally. Focus on your target schools' requirements
- High Participation State Students: If you're in a state with >50% participation and score above the state average, you're genuinely outperforming your peer group. This demonstrates strong academic skills
- Low Participation State Students: Your state's "high" average may not indicate you're competing against many students—just highly motivated, college-focused ones. Don't over-interpret state rankings
College Admissions Context
Colleges understand state-by-state variations and adjust expectations accordingly. Admissions officers evaluate your score considering your state's opportunities and educational context, but state average rankings don't factor into admissions decisions. Your individual score, GPA, school quality, and application components matter far more than your state's average placement.
🚀 Ready to Exceed Your State Average?
Whether your state ranks first or fifty-first, SATHELP24×7 provides comprehensive SAT preparation helping you reach YOUR specific score goals—not just beat your state average.
Achieve scores that strengthen your college applications and open doors to your dream schools! Start your SAT preparation today with SATHELP24×7's expert guides, practice problems, strategic tools, and personalized study resources.